“Know Your Judge”. Justice N. S. Sanjay Gowda. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda celebrates his 58th birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Neranahalli Srinivasan Sanjay Gowda: Born on 15.02.1967. Enrolled as an Advocate on 31.08.1989.

Appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and taken oath on 11.11.2019 and Permanent Judge on 08.09.2021.

Important Judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice N S Sanjay Gowda. 

Manufacture of Ethanol using sugarcane juice, sugar or sugar syrup is a sugar factory as defined under Clause 2(c) of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. Karnataka High Court.

Service Law. Seniority. Persons promoted in excess of backlog vacancies shall be continued against supernumerary posts. Karnataka High Court. 

Karnataka Municipalities Act. Deputy Commissioner in exercise of powers under Section 306 cannot act as an appellate authority and decide validity of the resolution passed by the Municipal Council. Karnataka High Court.

Equal Pay for Equal Work. Workers employed directly and through Contractor. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Intending purchaser already in possession prior to agreement of sale. Purchaser has to pay stamp duty as if possession delivered ‘under the agreement’. Stamp duty cannot be avoided by relying on prior possession.

Right to seek reference to arbitration is not lost if application under Section 8 is filed along with written statement. 

Karnataka Housing Board Act. Sanction of scheme by the State Government is mandatory before the Board takes up housing land development or labour development schemes. Karnataka High Court.

Land acquisition. 2013 Act. Lapse under Section 24 is only when acquisition was under 1894 Act. Section does not apply to acquisitions under State enactments. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act. Power to remove encroachment cannot be used to unilaterally determine encroachment of Government land and call upon the alleged encroacher to vacate and deliver possession. Karnataka High Court.

Locus Standi. When a litigation is filed in private interest and not as PIL- fundamental principles pertaining to locus standi have to be complied with by demonstrating violation of petitioners rights and in what manner. Karnataka High Court.

Preventive detention. Though writ petition challenging detention order even before the actual arrest is maintainable, interim stay of such order and grant of bail to accused is unsafe and hazardous. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Constitution, abolition etc of smaller urban areas. Governor should form an opinion that objections to the proposed notification being insufficient or invalid. Non compliance renders notification invalid. Karnataka High Court.

Indian Succession Act, 1925. Wills. Latest judgment of the Karnataka High Court on ingredients, revocation, alteration, proof of Will and evidence of handwriting expert.

”Classic case where the political parties and the police tried to bury the truth”. Karnataka High Court upholds CBI investigation against former Minister Vinay Kulkarni and others in a murder case.

In-service employee appointed to new post in new department on direct basis submitting technical resignation to his post. He cannot be repatriated to original post if new employer discharges him from service. Karnataka High Court.

Right to Information Act, 2005. There is no bar to furnish ‘B’ Report under RTI Act once the investigation is completed. Bar for grant of information applies only during investigation. Karnataka High Court.

A document cannot be registered unless the executant personally appears and establishes his identity to the registering officer and admits execution of the document under Sections 34 and 35 of the Registration Act. Karnataka High Court.

Labour law. When model standing orders are amended to enhance retirement age, trade unions can seek modification of the certified standing orders to bring them in conformity with the model standing orders. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Order of the Tribunal without bringing all the legal representatives of the deceased landlord on record is a nullity in the eye of law. Karnataka High Court.

Forfeiture of occupancy under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for non-payment of land revenue. Owner can pay the arrears of land revenue any time before the property is sold and get the land restored. Karnataka High Court.

In respect of lands notified prior to 1 January 2014 under the KIAD Act, if awards were not passed as on that date, awards are required to be passed only under the 2013 Act. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Revenue Act. When grant of lands is held to be valid, embarking upon a fresh enquiry regarding the revenue entries is impermissible. Karnataka High Court.

MVC claim. ‘Pay and recovery’ principle applies even when owner of vehicle 

contests claim petition or has preferred appeal against award. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Grant Rules,1969. When temporary lease of land is confirmed upon expiry of the lease period and on payment of fixed price, the Deputy Commissioner cannot impose condition of non-alienation. Karnataka High Court.

Farmers cannot be deprived the benefit under the Minimum Support Price Scheme simply because they did not register under the Web-Portal set up by the Department. Karnataka High Court.

Mere stay of a judgment in appeal would not preclude the Court from following the dictum laid down in the judgement. Karnataka High Court.

In respect of lands notified prior to 1 January 2014 under the KIAD Act and in respect of which an award has not been passed as on that day the awards are required to be passed under Section 24 (1) (a) of the 2013 Act. Karnataka Court.

Sale of immovable property cannot be invalidated by a subsequent declaration notifying the property as Wakf property. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Municipalities Act. In case of incomplete or incorrect property tax return, the Municipality has a right to assess property only for a period of six years and not beyond it. Karnataka High Court.

Once an instrument is admitted in evidence, even by inadvertence, the admissibility of the document on the ground it was insufficiently stamped cannot be questioned thereafter. Karnataka High Court.

District Court has no jurisdiction to direct the Trial Court to examine the admissibility of a document on the ground of non/under stamping after it had been admitted in evidence. Karnataka High Court.

Anti Defection Law. In the absence of any steps taken to serve whip in the manner known to law i.e., RPAD and courier or by personal service, mere affixture of the whip on the door is not sufficient. Karnataka High Court.

 Karnataka Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act. Karnataka High Court issues guidelines regulating service of whip.

National Highways Act. Disbursement of the compensation cannot be withheld or delayed merely on the ground that the award is sought to be challenged. Karnataka High Court.

Persons having tenancy rights can challenge acquisition proceedings initiated under the 2013 land acquisition Act. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act 1988. Rider of a borrowed vehicle can claim compensation under Section 163A for the death of pillion rider wife even though he steps into shoes of the owner and is responsible for the accident. Karnataka High Court.

Tax on electricity payable by consumer shall be on the basis of rate at which consumer purchases from Open Access Source and not at the rate at which the licensee sells to its consumers. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for partition. Plea of exclusive possession by the purchaser of coparcenery property is NOT a conclusive factor to determine court fee payable by the plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.

Revenue officers cannot go into the validity/correctness of the Order based on which the revenue entries are sought be made in the land records. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for partition. A person who is not a party to alienation of coparcenery property need NOT seek cancellation of sale deed or a declaration that he is not bound by the alienation. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for declaration in respect of non-agricultural lands. Court fee payable is NOT on the actual and prevailing market value of the land. Criteria is 15 times the profit or 30 times the revenue. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for permanent injunction in respect of immovable property can be continued by legal representatives after death of original plaintiff since right to enjoy possession is a transferable right. Karnataka High Court.

Second marriage solemnised before coming into force of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is valid. Children born from such marriage are legitimate children for the purpose of succession. Karnataka High Court.

Amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act applies even to woman who died before 2005. Legal representatives are entitled for share in the ancestral property. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act. In the event of an accident resulting in death or injury to employee, in the absence of a restrictive clause, liability of insurer cannot be limited to liability prescribed under the Employee’s Compensation Act. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act. Person who has a driving licence to drive a light motor vehicle can also drive a transport vehicle which has an unladen weight less than 7500 kg. Insurance company is liable to pay compensation. Karnataka High Court.

Cause of action in a partition suit is a recurring action. Dismissal of earlier suit for non-prosecution will not be a bar for filing a second suit for partition. Karnataka High Court.

Both “A” and “B” Kharab lands belong to owner of the land. Landowner is entitled for compensation in case of acquisition of kharab land. Karnataka High Court.

Wakf Board has no power to issue a corrigendum to the list of wakfs published in the gazette under Section 5(2) of the Wakf Act, 1954. Karnataka High Court.

Compensation for lands notified prior to 1:1:2014 under the KIAD Act, where award is not passed as on 1:1:2014, is to be paid under the 2013 land acquisition Act. Karnataka High Court.

Right of the defendant to file a separate suit for partition in respect of properties not included in the plaint is not barred merely because he did not make counter claim in respect of the omitted property. Karnataka High Court.

Suit regarding public trust. It is not necessary that the plaint with documents shall be filed only after the leave is granted. The Court can form an opinion to grant leave on going through the pleadings. Karnataka High Court.

Prevention of Corruption Act. ‘’According approval to investigate’’ is different from ’Sanction to prosecute’’. It is mandatory to obtain two different and separate approvals for investigation and for prosecution. Karnataka High Court.

Prevention of Corruption Act. Material furnished by the Investigating Officer need not be subjected to a microscopic examination before according approval to investigate a public servant. Karnataka High Court.

Upon death of plaintiff, right to sue survives only on the legal representatives. Person claiming a contractual right from the deceased plaintiff cannot come on record as co-plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act. Court is required to take into consideration the interest of the minor and safeguard the minors’ interest while granting permission to sell minor’s property. Karnataka High Court.

Unauthorized occupant of Government land has no right to invoke plea of adverse possession against the State. Karnataka High Court.

Grantee of land becomes owner of trees that were already existing on the land at the time of the grant if tree value did not exceed a particular amount prescribed under the Karnataka Land Grant Rules for their assessment. Karnataka High Court.

Deputy Commissioner cannot reject conversion of land after the expiry of four months stipulated under Section 95(5) of the KLR Act since conversion is deemed to have been granted due to inaction on the part of the Deputy Commissioner. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Conversion of land cannot be rejected only on the ground that there is no approach road to the land. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act. Term ‘Legal representative’ cannot be confined only to Class-I heirs under the Hindu Succession Act and is wider enough to include every legal representative who suffers on account of the death of a person. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Lands over which kumki privilege existed can be granted to any person, if he is able to establish that he is in unauthorised occupation over the said land prior to 14th day of April 1990. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Grant Rules. Deputy Commissioner cannot impose condition of non-alienation while granting permanent ownership as per the terms of the grant after expiry of the initial lease period. Karnataka High Court.

Aided educational institution, to which an employee is transferred as a result of being surplus, is bound to accept the employee so long as it seeks grant in aid for the post in the institution. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka High Court directs name change process for children be facilitated through a simplified affidavit process in the Register of Births, incorporating safeguards to ensure authenticity and prevent potential misuse.

A compromise decree among some co-owners cannot unilaterally change joint property ownership records. Khata registration must include all legal owners unless a competent court resolves the ownership dispute. Karnataka High Court.

When the sale of granted land by SC/ST person is cancelled, without taking actual possession from the transferee as per the PTCL Rules, permission to alienate the land cannot be granted. Karnataka High Court.

A residential site that falls within the Mutation Corridor under the Zoning Regulations retains its residential use designation. Consequently, the BDA cannot deny allotment of an alternate site solely on this ground. Karnataka High Court.

The regularisation of an unauthorised occupation of a land, even in favour of a person belonging to a member of the SC/ST, does not come within the meaning of ‘granted land’ as defined under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. A right to succeed to the property by the daughter of the grantee cannot be termed to be a transfer under the terms of the Act. Karnataka High Court.

Union of India has no legislative competence to frame Green Energy Open Access Rules. Karnataka High Court strikes down Electricity (Promoting Renewable Energy Through Green Energy Open Access) Rules 2022.

Prosecution of a public servant by Police Wing of the Lokayukta and departmental inquiry by Administrative and Inquiry wings of the Lokayukta results in ‘inevitable bias’. Karnataka High Court strikes down KEB Regulation as manifestly arbitrary.

Hindu Marriage Act. Consent divorce under Section 13B. Parties can be represented by their partners or siblings as GPA holders subject to the satisfaction of the court. Karnataka High Court.

Unless physical possession of property is taken, the Government would not get the benefit of the savings provision in the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act. Karnataka High Court.

“Every child would achieve a greater degree of success than his parents and his earning a living wage would not be beyond the realm of possibility.” Comprehensive judgment of the Karnataka High Court on assessing minor’s income in accident cases.

Execution. Once the auction is held, it is the duty of the Court to ensure that the auction money is deposited within 15 days and upon the failure, to forfeit the deposit and resell the property. Court cannot extend time to deposit. Karnataka High Court.

Gift is between Donor and Donee. When donor who challenged gift deed withdraws the suit, his children cannot question the gift deed on the ground of fraud etc. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Adopted son who claims ownership by succession cannot claim tenancy under the deceased adopted father/mother. Karnataka High Court.

A person, whose claim for title is negatived, cannot maintain a suit for injunction. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Tenant has first option to purchase land held in tenancy. Karnataka High Court quashes permission granted by Tahsildar to sell the tenanted land to outsider.

Lokayukta has no power to make a recommendation to the Government that enquiry against a Government servant should be entrusted to Lokayukta only. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Even the land which is ‘capable of being used for agricultural purposes’ has to be construed as an agricultural land. Existence of houses assessed for property tax is irrelevant. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Land Tribunal on the passing of an order either rejecting or granting occupancy rights has no power to consider the claim on merits even if it is by consent of the tenant. Karnataka High Court.

Bank cannot lend loan without verifying title to property which actually belongs to third party owners. Karnataka High Court quashes illegal auction sale, cancels revenue entries and orders restoration of possession to the owners.

Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Lands over which kumki privilege existed can be granted to any person, if he is able to establish that he is in unauthorised occupation over the said land prior to 14th day of April 1990. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act. Power to remove encroachment cannot be used to unilaterally determine encroachment of Government land and call upon the alleged encroacher to vacate and deliver possession. Karnataka High Court.

Unauthorized occupant of Government land has no right to invoke plea of adverse possession against the State. Karnataka High Court.

“Know Your Judge”. Justice T.G. Shivashankare Gowda. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.G. Shivashankare Gowda celebrates his 62nd birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Talkad Girigowda Shivashankare Gowda: Born on 01.02.1963. Native of Talakad, T. Narasipura Taluk, Mysore District. Enrolled as Advocate and practiced at Srirangapatna. Appointed as Munsiff on 08.02.1995. Appointed as District Judge on 06.07.2009. Served as Prl. District & Sessions Judge at U.K. Karwar. Served as Central Project Co-ordinator (Computers), Registrar (Computers) and Registrar General at High Court of Karnataka. Sworn-in as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on 16.08.2022.

Important judgments delivered by Mr. Justice T G Shivashankare Gowda.

”Speculative litigation causing huge loss of judicial time”. Karnataka High Court reverses specific performance judgement against Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust with exemplary costs.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/jLYqu3CwODYQ6yf2v4U0iM4yd

Education. Admission of students pursuant to interim order cannot be sustained if it results in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZIbKGptLgjl3L1cxDSu6Q9Di3

Medical Colleges Regulation. Bar against conducting inspection two days before and after important religious and festival holidays under Regulation 8(3)(1) applies only to Government notified holidays. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/WF7ivbdtkFE1eZMuV812ifFAH

Motor Vehicles Act. Burden of proving that the deceased driver did not possess valid driving licence at the time of the accident is upon the Insurance Company. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/45cY1jA2dOzNQ7M2NB5RANC8n

Arbitrary action of the Karnataka Examination Authority in allotment of post graduate medical seat. Karnataka High Court imposes cost of Rs. 5 lakhs with a direction to allot the seat to the deserving candidate. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/qTXxKZWLrrWSrfxtcEMipSUEN

Motor Vehicle Cases. If accident aggravates already existing decease which results in death, claim petition cannot be rejected for want of nexus. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/LHwoPBiOSCFsmZ439BXkHVucc

Criminal trial. In a case resting on circumstantial evidence, motive plays a crucial role. Motive is a double-edged weapon, which will cut either side of the case. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ONEImVpFkuwTE0O7NE93h8sWK

“Case of the prosecution in entirety is found to be doubtful and is full of inconsistencies”. Karnataka High Court acquits the accused in RTI activist Lingaraju murder case.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/7ESptiW1T0lwUWU2fELME2RFA

Criminal trial. Insistence of plurality of witnesses in proof of any fact will indirectly encourage subornation of witnesses. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/bzKnZ5IOekWAjffAPiAYxoFzN

MVC Case. Split multiplier. Higher multiplier for the salary component and lower multiplier for the pension component is justified when the person had no future prospect of re-employment. Karnataka High Court explains.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/rF9w2HacF7tOstqC4XzSmHFCN

Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Mobile phone chargers sold along with mobile phone in a composite pack attracts tax at the same rate as applicable to mobile phones and cannot be taxed at higher rate as unscheduled goods. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/7CfyFm9UZudtXoWZKRRqaHsmz

Central Goods and Services Tax Act. Pre-paid Payment Instruments of Gift Vouchers, Cash Back Vouchers and E-Vouchers do not fall under the category of goods and services and they are exempted from levy of tax. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/aDZVW79JQIjtSznmLBt2vtWCC

Insurance against acts of fraud or dishonesty committed by agent. Issuance of a fake bank guarantee by agent is a dishonest act and hence covered under the Insurance Policy. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Mt2HKTYvVEmunM3nvEQrp9bcd

“Interest of the child is paramount in cases under the POCSO Act and the Court cannot appreciate the evidence on sentimental values.” Karnataka High Court sets aside the acquittal of the sexual offender.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/v4DaRpswmkujb2pDOyNZZ4abK

“Removing minor girl from the lawful custody of parents is clear case of kidnap”. Karnataka High Court convicts the accused while confirming his acquittal for the offence under the POCSO Act.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/z9lwayrdyWmzkfEGYLRyu9IPZ

Summary suit based on written contract. There is no requirement that the written contract should be signed by both the parties. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/zlfc7hBTG1YjEbEgb78yK5ZnM

‘’Mother is more concerned about her career prospects than the welfare of the child’’. Karnataka High Court extensively interacts with the child and grants custody to the father with visitation rights to the mother.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/kEhkwmQwodDfmj3GCmad3Xwki

Wife and children of the plaintiff, who contested against the plaintiff in the suit, cannot come on record as his legal representatives in the suit/appeal due to conflict of interest. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/800099f587cf94ad8f56f9e8

“Know Your Judge”. Justice C.M. Joshi. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice C.M. Joshi celebrates his 61st birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Chandarashekar Mrutyunjaya Joshi: Born on 24.01.1964. Native of Hubballi. Enrolled as Advocate and practiced at Hubballi. Appointed as Munsiff on 08.02.1995. Appointed as District Judge on 06.07.2009. Served as Deputy Secretary, Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Central Project Co-ordinator (Computers), Registrar (Computers) at High Court of Karnataka and as Prl. District & Sessions Judge, Udupi, Belagavi & Prl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. Sworn-in as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on 16.08.2022.

Important judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice C M Joshi.

Criminal law. Call records regarding conversation between accused and deceased are inadmissible in evidence unless the Certificate required under Section 65B of the Evidence Act is produced. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sRsc59ZvrxNYUfN0wMgVfjdmw

Motor Vehicle Act. When a claim petition is filed under Section 163A and the evidence on record shows the income is above Rs.40,000/- p.a, the claim petition is liable to be rejected, unless it is converted to one under Section 166. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/M3DQf8Bqn8yuh7DRlj9iiwWfQ

Disciplinary proceedings against daily wage employee can be initiated under the Karnataka Daily Wage Employees Welfare Act, 2012 only if his name is notified by the State Government as daily wage employee. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/188NQJk9eEuJbsxbjZ1mXccjN

An order of acquittal adds up to the presumption of innocence in favour of the accused and hence the Appellate Court has to be relatively slow in reversing the order. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/JKErAZPwa2A80zeZY6IJ8YYtf

Property allotted to a female in family partition between herself and her father is her absolute property and does not revert to heirs of her father under Section 15 (2) of the Hindu Succession Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0GSAvqWzFvg7BQeuJtMe8MXPE

Service benefits do not form bequeathable estate of Government Servant. Family pension does not form part of the estate of the deceased and as such it cannot be disposed off during lifetime by testamentary disposition. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/nkq4qgzHH8eQerJub77MJieWi

Grant of Succession Certificate will not determine rights of parties since it merely identifies the hands in which death benefits be given and it does not entitle such person to appropriate such benefits to himself. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/FpGy47XzWhxSr6A2u19MQ6ok6

Adopted son becomes a coparcener in the adoptor’s family and cannot claim right in his genitive family properties. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VsbGFAze5zHsxbp8uhudbl7bR

In case of ‘Act Only Policy’ which does not cover pillion rider with extra premium, liability cannot be fastened on the insurance company. Even the principle of ‘pay and recover‘ does not apply in such cases. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/gPDsYnJA9UmTVCcx6qtpnVtVo

When ‘package/comprehensive’ policy is issued, it covers all including the occupant, driver, pillion rider and the owner. Premium paid is irrelevant. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/lPPuQpPRt0cLfNpjy7NqzLbQP

Karnataka Excise (General Conditions) Rules. Profit sharing ratio change in a partnership firm by 50% and above amounts to ‘’change of control and management of a firm’’ and attracts payment of transfer fee under the Rules. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/899d5fca0ba22bbcc8414526

The limitation period for instituting probate proceedings for a Will is three years, as per the residuary provision of the Limitation Act, subject to specified exceptions. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ba6b6b45b56c8ec4408877d9

Service Law. Deemed suspension of an employee would continue even after his detention comes to an end by virtue of enlargement on bail or otherwise till after the competent authority issues a formal order revoking the suspension. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/cb67b9254289bd3175ee96a0

Hindu Succession Act. Partition of ancestral properties prior to 2004 amendment does not affect rights of daughters in the ancestral property notionally allotted to the father. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0749450816a0b296614abf0d

When brothers partition ancestral property, it continues as ancestral property. Son/daughter born after the partition will automatically acquire rights by birth. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0d9d67afd9ca0054b7972bc4

Service Law. ‘’It is the prerogative of the employer to deploy his staff suitable to the requirement of work/place unless the conditions of service otherwise provide’’. Employees cannot sit in self-judgment as to the validity of transfer order and disobey the same with impunity. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/59ec2b524a9c62870d398ea6

Bombay Pargana and Kulkarni Watan Abolition Act. Watan property belongs to the entire family, with all family members having hereditary interests eligible for a share. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/d801eebeebce168cfd5d15d9

Service Law. When a person is placed in independent charge of a post, albeit being eligible for promotion to that post, and later receives retrospective promotion, he is entitled to salary arrears corresponding to the pay scale of the said post. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/d53b09384b6f3a7a14b115ec

Karnataka Excise (General Conditions) Rules. Profit sharing ratio change in a partnership firm by 50% and above amounts to ‘’change of control and management of a firm’’ and attracts payment of transfer fee under the Rules. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/899d5fca0ba22bbcc8414526

Urban Development Authority’s imposition of a penalty for non-construction on the allotted site by the allottee within the stipulated period cannot be held to be unreasonable. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/416688f6af7fc3d289dc45f9

POCSO Act. Document relating to date of birth of a student issued by School on the basis of entry of the date of birth made in the admission register can be relied for the purpose of age determination. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/eVXsN8XXe7FGAkCaBb5FVy7PY

A person who acquires an interest in the suit property during the pendency of the suit can seek to be impleaded at the appeal stage by invoking Section 146 of the CPC which provision should be interpreted broadly and liberally to promote justice. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/46267a95d6be1d8788102fcd

“Know Your Judge”. Justice Umesh M Adiga. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Umesh M Adiga celebrates his 61st birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Umesh Manjunath Bhat Adiga: Born on 09.01.1964. Native of Gadag. Enrolled as Advocate and practiced at Gadag. Appointed as Munsiff on 08.02.1995. Appointed as District Judge on 06.07.2009. Served as Registrar (Vigilance) High Court of Karnataka, Prl. District & Sessions Judge, Chikkamagaluru, Dharwad and as Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru. Sworn-in as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on 16.08.2022.

Important Judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Umesh M Adiga.

Service Law. Person ineligible for the post cannot question the appointment of another person to the post since Public Interest Litigation is impermissible in Service matters. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/dkllsV6yLApcTI0vMBk36ueJD

When proceedings are initiated under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, the authorities are bound to examine whether the grant comes within the purview of the Act. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/knyP6X0qU1GSKaKOj5QXLenQO

Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act. Competent authority has discretion to reduce the percentage of damages under Section 14B and the same is justiciable. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Bo2POtFSS5h25GuN9rYugrfTp

Mere payment of premium amount before occurrence of accident will not cover liability if the insurance policy is issued with effect from the time after the accident. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/WdjePhtI9Mcj3G1HCapAgHfzq

Mere existence of Arbitration Clause does not bar jurisdiction of the Civil Court unless the party exercises his right under Section 8 of the A & C Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/wmCmITKVQysZ76UZBIPrkNxfJ

Where driver of vehicle had no valid and effective driving licence, the insurance company shall pay the compensation to the claimant and recover the same from owner of the vehicle. Karnataka High Court reiterates. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/KTohNi0scrGMCG88PW03QRIMX

MVC Act. Amputation of leg need not always result in 100% disability for the purpose of awarding compensation when the claimant can do the work which is not strenuous in nature. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/udkOeV7yKIdTeFHtQuBxtwqzQ

Borrower of motor vehicle steps into the shoes of the owner of the vehicle and hence the borrower of the vehicle or his legal heirs are not entitled for compensation. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/4uLoS35AvEzCdQGRQuO1p74ja

“Coparcenary system continues even after the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act.” Karnataka High Court explains the principles behind succession and survivorship.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/09ff1203861b457fdba31787

Income Tax Act. Exemption from restriction on cash transaction can be claimed only for special exigencies the burden of proving is on the assessee. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/BgWqjPltgcpzB4sqwD2ztf310

“Know Your Judge”. Justice B M Shyam Prasad. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B M Shyam Prasad celebrates his 54th birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bhotanhosur Mallikarjuna Shyam Prasad: Born on 8th January 1971. Appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and took oath on 14.02.2018 and Permanent Judge on 07.01.2020.

Important Judgements delivered by Mr. Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad. 

Property inherited by a female from her parents reverts back to heirs of her father on she dying intestate and without issues. Suit for declaration by husband claiming such property ought to be rejected under Order 7 rule 11. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/NWLKO48RRXZ6i2vVzSBW34wIs

Once parties acknowledge existence of arbitration clause, Court can appoint arbitrator even if stamp duty is insufficiently paid. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/u2ntQqAc5HYTyzYrqEjahBZVD

When the prosecution fails to prove major offence, the minor and related offence falls into insignificance and the accused will be entitled to acquittal. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/6kOPhZhSX9PhLmdSbdJoyg0VF

Arbitration and Conciliation Act. When arbitrator withdraws from the office, substitute arbitrator can be appointed only under Section 11 read with Section 15 and under Section 29A(4) thereof. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/kr56zwOoMI67AGDKvEURnTZPo

Appeal court should not allow amendment unless there is an error in the decree of the trial court and when the amendment relieves the party who lost the case from the consequences of a decision rendered on merits. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/C2RKlsSnuzv8PR0K2MiDB7jnv

Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Suit for cancellation of sale deed in respect of agricultural land. Valuation is based on the land revenue and not on the amount shown in the sale deed. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/XHwSeoIldKEHJ5yZMh1SbjsQr

Property inherited by a female from her parents reverts back to heirs of her father on she dying intestate and without issues. Suit for declaration by husband claiming such property ought to be rejected under Order 7 rule 11. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/NWLKO48RRXZ6i2vVzSBW34wIs

Once parties acknowledge existence of arbitration clause, Court can appoint arbitrator even if stamp duty is insufficiently paid. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/u2ntQqAc5HYTyzYrqEjahBZVD

When the prosecution fails to prove major offence, the minor and related offence falls into insignificance and the accused will be entitled to acquittal. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/6kOPhZhSX9PhLmdSbdJoyg0VF

 Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Questions of facts that impact title cannot be decided in proceedings under Chapter XI. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/PQZXALCma7nn1QdRZlH6HMjTR

 Bombay Pargana and Kulkarni Watan Abolition Act. Watan property belongs to the entire family, with all family members having hereditary interests eligible for a share. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/d801eebeebce168cfd5d15d9

Karnataka Stamp Act. Civil court cannot delegate its power to the District Registrar of Stamps to decide on the nature of the document and to determine the deficit duty. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/66fa35b9e9f839de43052b77

Petition for Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of limitation. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ITALzJNwgnLNch6fj8kRkXZe8

Wife with good educational qualification who quit salaried employment without any reason cannot demand maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Sg2NM9xS3d6MhzG0vztcItRkB

BBMP Act. Improvement expenses can be collected in instalments for transfer of khata. Non-payment of instalment cannot be a reason to deny benefit of revenue entry since the amount can be recovered in accordance with law. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/C8UCbF2KQuWY52iJwpRa2yjvY

Inter-State transmission of electricity under Section 11 of the Electricity Act 2003 can be regulated only by the Central Government. Karnataka High Court nullifies order of the State Government.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/zZfWEQ0cWCvVIsvMXnhaEiyIy

Pious obligation under the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act arises only if the plaintiff is able to demonstrate that the defendant has inherited some asset or estate from the deceased debtor. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0dh92Sr6cpwIhzWXoNDOgZbP1

“Know Your Judge”. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi celebrates his 55th birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi: Born on 01.01.1970. Enrolled as an Advocate in the year 1995. Practiced in High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench from 2008 to till date.

Practiced in the field of Civil, Land Acquisition and Service Matters etc,.

Panel Advocate – Hyderabad Karnataka Education Society, Gulbarga, Khaja Banda Nawaj Education Society, Gulbarga, Alstom Project India Limited, Shahabad, ACC, Wadi, Karnataka State Financial Corporation, Karnataka State Industrial and Development Board, Ganesh Co-Operative Bank, Gulbarga, Punjab National Bank, Gulbarga, Hutti Goldmines, Hutti, Dist. Raichur, The Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited.

Appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and taken oath on 23.09.2019 and Permanent Judge on 01.03.2021.

Important judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok S. Kinagi. 

Resumption under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act cannot be ordered when grantee obtained conversion of land for non-agricultural purposes before the alienation. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/OiwuuVQoRpueJqpc7FH7hYD6L

Stay of suit under Section 10 CPC is permissible only if the whole subject-matter in both the proceedings is identical and not incidentally or collaterally in issue. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ISyNrSJgH381e8MtCf04I4l04

Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. When earlier suo-motu proceedings were dropped by the Assistant Commissioner, fresh proceedings cannot be initiated by the grantee without challenging the said order. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/AJoh9OSw8sVKmUY0TY8lh8ZRs

Karnataka Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act. The Civil Court must record a clear finding about land grabbing in order to transfer the case to Special Court. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/EGK34DoAowG3lrQycFrNCzzDc

Land restored under SC/ST (PTCL) Act to original grantees cannot be construed as Government land to invoke the provisions of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/KMirgxzIfHIasSUONZITE3FNF

Constitution of India. Article 226. In a writ petition challenging the interim order passed by a Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal, refusal to interfere is a rule and interference is an exception. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/f6Nx5lw1qIxLAedTjeNJh6qlU

Intra-court appeal under the Karnataka High Court Act is not maintainable against an order passed by the Single Judge assailing an award passed by the Labour Court. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/l0APyr5QOvLYbT4oaN5KX6ECp

Even an earlier registered sale deed does not confer right over property declared subsequently as Wakf property as long as the declaration is not set aside. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/rjUWKppk5Jz9Crx4A9DRrYfhx

Application for amendment of pleadings cannot be entertained after the commencement of trial, unless the party could not raise the issue before commencement of trial. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sMarBhAdVKojnF0UufQjj3BcG

Corporation cannot demand tax in respect of an industrial plot unless the industrial area is included within the Corporation limits. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/RK1tWgpbzRJ8W20fMI68zH1RQ

Khata of property cannot be changed when civil suit in respect of the property is pending adjudication before the Court. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VRjwUmsxIdjlhPxowCXaMuqLN

KMMC Rules. When the order of Competent Authority is approved by the Controlling Authority, who is also the Revision authority, Revision can only be filed before the State Government. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/qShEUGV1528ixEHut1KH6TnwW

Committees under Article 194(3) of the Constitution are not vested with adjudicatory jurisdiction which belongs to judicature under the constitutional scheme. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/DRiFF4ELOPCsOOmhovGy5jU0W

Allotment of industrial plot cannot be cancelled on the ground of delay in implementing the project when the delay is attributable to reasons beyond the capacity of the allottee. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/MpX5z3ecw3FQlLMJp2Xt83JlL

Transfer of Property Act. Upon valid transfer of property, attornment of tenancy takes place and the tenant cannot question such derivative title. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/QLLLgiNiMY5RdR3XbB9M9o6Az

Property of first wife dying intestate goes even to the legally married second wife after the death of her husband. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/LMHdIWYo2SZXPoAijtDGUKZlL

Unless the factum of Benami transaction is established, property purchased in the name of female becomes her absolute property. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/x26LL47guabJs0lpH9QE5bbb5

Suit for specific performance. When the defendant neither pleads nor leads evidence on hardship, Court shall decree the suit especially when the plaintiff proves readiness & willingness. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZYHIFcx04MWCD3uvVPPjBcDAm

Resumption under the Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act cannot be ordered when grantee obtained conversion of land for non-agricultural purposes before the alienation. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/OiwuuVQoRpueJqpc7FH7hYD6L

Stay of suit under Section 10 CPC is permissible only if the whole subject-matter in both the proceedings is identical and not incidentally or collaterally in issue. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ISyNrSJgH381e8MtCf04I4l04

Prior notice under the Karnataka Panchayat Act is not necessary for institution of suit for perpetual injunction under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/2bcafd2a4a7af0be3972321e

Hindu Succession Act, 1956. When propositus dies prior to 1956 leaving ancestral properties, the entire ancestral properties vest in surviving male coparceners excluding the daughters. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/3c53d86db0150c64708045d7

Civil suit against Forest Officers who act under the color of duty to preserve forest land is not maintainable without sanction of the State Government under Section 114-A of the Karnataka Forest Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/y1iurkwuwmKFmSjrvjaehltPQ

Issue regarding valuation and Court fees cannot be tried as a preliminary issue in a suit and shall be tried along with other issues. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/CyRjk03cFcS7mUVjkJpGeCYhP

Specific performance. Agreement executed within the prohibited period under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act cannot be specifically enforced. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/JXbvzbdckChHoVjXFDJpo1KqR

Violation of condition in land grant order will not result in automatic cancellation of the grant unless the Government initiates proceedings for resumption of the land. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/JtXVUH9RmrCs4V9LcX1QeKALm

Court Fee. When agricultural land falls within the Corporation limit, the market value has to be taken into consideration even though the land continues to be shown as agricultural in the revenue records. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/HkAL3PAu5vbuxONOKfhi0o1vo

When Court dismisses suit for declaration of title over the property, it cannot grant consequential relief of injunction. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/JqwSQTq6C8L2ZyKAVKbR4nNOF

“Dependency on daughter does not end with her marriage”. Parents can seek compensation for the death of their daughter in a motor vehicle accident. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/YDS3pP7FsADexvx4huD28syXL

Power of attorney executed in favour of blood relatives as mentioned in the Karnataka Stamp Act need not be stamped as a document of conveyance. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/KTGpPlrPqnrMIOpJh0M53Z8NN

Sale of ancestral property. Recitals in the sale deed of legal necessity do not by themselves prove the legal necessity though they are admissible in evidence. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/DCTfmAhlPFYnuhaDoxGvzTS1c

Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Land converted for non-agricultural purposes no longer remains ‘granted land’ and hence there is no requirement of prior permission to sell such land. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/E45odxkodFuDhdjNGkJv36YV5

Persons who purchased suit schedule property during the pendency of suit for specific performance can be added as additional defendant. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/OvGKh1uIz1CF8oMo5DRVLJuLb

Delay in completion of the project on the industrial site allotted by the KIADB. Allotment cannot be straightaway cancelled by the authority without giving opportunity to the allottee. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/OrhSyIDPU905gZ3aTOfk67ucB

In a suit for declaration, the plaintiff is expected to prove his title to a high degree of probability and not beyond reasonable doubt. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/a7PrNU32SJlsz0dmpEmxrWjR1

Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Prima facie, the amendment to the Act does not change the legal position that the application for restoration has to be filed within reasonable time. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/NKABMwxdCpjentz4o0ahuXCK0

Intra-court appeal under the Karnataka High Court Act is not maintainable against an order passed by the Single Judge assailing an award passed by the Labour Court. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/l0APyr5QOvLYbT4oaN5KX6ECp

“Know Your Judge”. Justice K. S. Mudagal. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice K. S. Mudagal celebrates her 61st birthday today.

Hon’ble Justice Kottravva Somappa Mudagal: Born on December 22, 1963. Obtained B’Com, LL.B. from Karnataka University, Dharwad. Joined legal profession on 6th July, 1988 as an Advocate at Dharwad and Bangalore. Appointed as District Judge on 17.06.1998. Sworn in as an Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on 14th November, 2016 and Permanent Judge on 03.11.2018.


Important Judgments delivered by Hon’ble Justice K.S. Mudagal.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sd0Q8L8Vsn72lJaNK9hRpTVBP

Civil Procedure Code. Order 39 Rule 2A. Dismissal of the main suit does NOT absolve the defendants of their liability for breach of injunction order. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/HDi8Ar70SeQsU7IKaNDGgKGrt

Civil Procedure Code. Order 39 Rule 2A. Party knowingly violating injunction order cannot contend that the order is null and void or irregular and hence need not be obeyed. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/doq2ZJ1cL174XoTShzazVpvY1

Father is liable to pay maintenance to the major daughters and also their marriage expenses. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/safl4XAfonRmtRcXiuhJkQYm9

Rejection of Plaint. When plaint is sought to be rejected on a pure question of law, the application cannot be dismissed on the ground that the same shall be considered on a full-fledged trial. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/qMSVh6gNu4M7hjsvuCfxuulkn

Lok Adalat award in respect of cheque bounce case. Amount can be recovered by Fine Levy Warrant under Section 421 Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/7MvnKohB6twQdFnx5soDk5xw8

Daily waged employees working in the local bodies like Zilla Panchayats, on their regularization, are entitled for payment of gratuity from the date of their initial appointment. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Zve6Y66D7jmAg0DwH4jw7OWBY

Delay and laches in filing Writ Petition. Where respondents/authorities are themselves guilty of delay and latches, they cannot raise such plea against petitioner. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZwFdOWD8MGRgR9hesBCLJMmke

UAP Act. Informal body of individuals ‘concerned’ with the terrorist act, though not actually involved in terrorist act, is also covered under the definition of ‘terrorist gang’. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/uGaf6mIY8LqirEHQlLzHbvugL

Review Petition by non-party to the proceedings. Court can review compromise decree recorded in Regular Second Appeal if there was suppression of facts affecting the rights of third party. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/D7Kh5F5ITMkXO3QdgnXyzzAKZ

Rider of two-wheeler not possessing driving license. Insurance Company is NOT liable for compensation. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VtxHqMbCMFBvq62sksg47VJJU

Unregistered sale deed cannot be received in evidence even for the collateral purposes of proving possession. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/kr1ILiFm8QqqsjeFNRQ0MeIMH

Civil suit questioning attachment of property under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules is not maintainable without exhausting the remedy provided under Section 101 of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/oNHZFvtImqqTWP5XKVgq7mb0W

For the lands falling within Corporation limits, there is no need to obtain conversion from agricultural to non-agricultural purpose under Section 95 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/XVQW4GToCwGdrW8wh7NPuI2Mn

Hindu Law. There can be partition of ancestral properties among the cousins and need not always be among the direct brothers. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/kiicapGeNHKavK6qPVLiTDRFd

Native Christians of Coorg province. Pending suit for partition based on the Shasthric Hindu Law is not maintainable after the issuance of 2015 notification making Indian Succession Applicable to them. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/LRb4Ivbd1DV1vGyiqf1w9FLEF

Prima facie case includes maintainability of the suit. When maintainability of the suit is doubtful or the suit is prima facie vexatious, it cannot be said that the applicant has prima facie case. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sd0Q8L8Vsn72lJaNK9hRpTVBP

Occupancy rights granted under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in favour of one of the member of the family enure to the benefit of the members of the joint family. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/lF5DMXHGrmAQlMrRSa3Pl3uh3

Industry showing payment of overtime wages as conveyance charges to evade the ESI contribution. Karnataka High Court imposes exemplary cost on the appellant industry.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0I7Ub7xrWjtqw1kh5hnvFyfHJ

Defense of ouster in a suit for possession. The adverse possession pleaded must be open, express or implied repudiation of the rights of the true owner and the hostility must be within the knowledge of true owner. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/cde5f29561bc4fad17b78f88

Irrespective of a party not filing appeal against dismissal of the suit for partition and separate possession, Court can grant relief in appeal invoking Order XLI Rule 33 of C.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/oFp4Zu7PHNvVkamQTBOyddDIc

Court cannot refer a case relating to non-compoundable offence to Lok Adalat and Lok Adalat has no jurisdiction to determine such case. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/SuXT6tGDrf3ZNJtwJ82gw0BhU

Negotiable Instruments Act. Section 138 not only includes the cheques issued towards the discharge of any debt, but other liability also. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/xLxdPabUGBEBSis6bkIxjoDHj

Unstamped partition deed cannot be relied upon for the purpose of enforcing pre-emption clause contained therein. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/pwXoqKLUV5Dv0EMgIzq9sZAOU

When a document is admitted in evidence at the instance of a party, entire contents of the document shall be accepted. Party producing the document cannot contend that only portion of the document shall be accepted. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/cOzHcDr5pPpKirFiAOOFgCHnj

Though Christian law does not recognize adoption, it does not prohibit adoption. Adopted children of Christian parents have right of inheritance. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/1eq6RjH4AZlsAkIjhrUNyCm4A

When minor’s property is sold without Court permission, the minor on attaining majority need not seek cancellation of the sale deed. He can simply repudiate the sale and validly transfer the property. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Vo8yNcsXDXheORtEc7YSD0AJK

Rejection of Plaint. When plaint is sought to be rejected on a pure question of law, the application cannot be dismissed on the ground that the same shall be considered on a full-fledged trial. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/qMSVh6gNu4M7hjsvuCfxuulkn

ಉಯಿಲು ಕುರಿತ ಮೊಕದ್ದಮೆ. ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿಯೇ ತೀರ್ಪು ನೀಡಿದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಉಚ್ಚನ್ಯಾಯಲಯ.

ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಉಚ್ಚನ್ಯಾಯಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿಯೇ ಮೊದಲ ತೀರ್ಪು ನೀಡಿದ ಕೀರ್ತಿ ಮಾನ್ಯ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂತಿ೯ ಅರಳಿ ನಾಗರಾಜ್ ರವರಿಗೆ ಸಲ್ಲುತ್ತದೆ. ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ ತೀರ್ಪು ನೀಡಿದ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂತಿ೯ ಅರಳಿ ನಾಗರಾಜ್ “ಕೆಳ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಕನ್ನಡ ಭಾಷೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ತೀರ್ಪು ಬರೆಯಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದೆ. ಹೈಕೋರ್ಟ್‌ನಲ್ಲೂ ಕನ್ನಡ ಭಾಷೆಗೆ ಆದ್ಯತೆ ನೀಡಬೇಕು. ಈ ನಿಟ್ಟಿನಲ್ಲಿ 2008ರಿಂದ ಸರಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಬೇಡಿಕೆ ಸಲ್ಲಿಸುತ್ತಲೇ ಬಂದಿದ್ದರೂ ಇದುವರೆಗೂ ಕಾರ್ಯರೂಪಕ್ಕೆ ಬಂದಿಲ್ಲ.“ ಎ0ದು ಹೇಳಿದ್ದರು.

ಈಗ ಮಾನ್ಯ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂತಿ೯ ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಎಸ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ ಮತ್ತು ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂತಿ೯ ಸಿ. ಎ0. ಜೋಶಿಯವರು ಶ್ರೀ. ನ0ಜಾವುದೂತ ಸ್ವಾಮೀಜಿ ವಿರುದ್ದ ಶ್ರಿ. ಎಸ್. ಲಿ0ಗಣ್ಣ ಮತ್ತು ಇತರರು ಮೊಕದ್ದಮೆಯಲ್ಲಿ (ಒ.ಎಸ್.ಎ. ಸ0ಖ್ಯೆ. ೯/೨0೨೪) ದಿನಾ0ಕ ೧೨ನೇ ಡಿಸೆ0ಬರ್, ೨0೨೪ ರ0ದು ಕನ್ನಡದಲ್ಲಿ ತೀರ್ಪು ನೀಡಿದ್ದಾರೆ.

ಈ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ದಕ್ಷ ಲೀಗಲ್ ಜೊತೆ ತಮ್ಮ ಅನಿಸಿಕೆ ಹೇಳಿಕೊ0ಡ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂತಿ೯ ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಎಸ್ ದೀಕ್ಷಿತ್ “ಪ್ರಾಮಾಣಿಕವಾಗಿ ಹೇಳುವುದಾದರೆ, ಕನ್ನಡ ತೀರ್ಪು ಬರೆದ ಶ್ರೇಯಸ್ಸು ಮಾನ್ಯ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂತಿ೯ ಅರಳಿ ನಾಗರಾಜ್ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಸಲ್ಲಬೇಕು.. ಆ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ಕೆ ಕೈಹಾಕಿದ ಅವರು ನಿಜವಾದ ‘ತೇನ್ಸಿಂಗ್’.. .. ನನಗೆ ಅವರ ಮೇಲೆ ಅಪಾರ ಗೌರವವಿದೆ” ಎ0ದು ತಮ್ಮ ಅಭಿಮಾನ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಪಡಿಸಿದರು.

ತೀರ್ಪನ್ನು ಈ ಕೆಳಗೆ ಲಗತ್ತಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ.

“Know Your Judge”. Justice H.P. Sandesh. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh celebrates his 60h birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hethur Puttaswamygowda Sandesh: Born on December 2nd 1964, at Hethur in Sakaleshpur Taluk, Hassan District to Late Sri. Puttaswamy Gowda and Late Smt. Kaveramma as a second son. He had his Primary Education at Hethur and Sakaleshpur. Secondary Education at Pre-University Government College, Sakaleshpur.

Thereafter, obtained 5 years Law Degree from M. Krishna Law College, Mysuru University from 1987 to 1992 and started practice with Sri.K. Anantharamaiah, Senior Advocate on both Civil and Criminal Law at Hassan. Thereafter, shifted his practice to Bengaluru in 1994. He has practiced both on Civil and Criminal side in High Court and District Judiciary in Bengaluru.

Thereafter, directly selected as District & Sessions Judge in 2002 and worked as I Additional District & Sessions Judge, Mandya and Mangaluru, Principal Secretary to Hon’ble The Chief Justice, Registrar (Administration) in High Court of Karnataka, Principal District & Sessions Judge, Mysuru and Haveri, Registrar (Infrastructure), Registrar (Administration), Secretary to Hon’ble The Chief Justice, High Court of Karnataka, Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Registrar (Vigilance), High Court of Karnataka and elevated as Additional Judge, High Court of Karnataka on 03.11.2018 and permanent Judge on 26.02.2020.

Got married to Smt. Hemavathi and has two daughters by name Kum. Sahana Sandesh, who is an Engineering graduate and Kum. Sneha Sandesh, who is pursuing her MBBS., and now doing her internship in M.S.Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru.

Hobbies: Reading and playing Cricket.

Important judgments delivered by Hon’ble Justice H.P. Sandesh.

Criminal Procedure Code. Section 482. Mere pendency of civil suit on the issue is not a ground to quash criminal proceedings when serious allegations are made in chargesheet. Karnataka High Court.

Negotiable Instruments Act. Whether a cheque is issued in respect of a time barred debt is a matter for trial. Proceedings cannot be quashed on this ground. Karnataka High Court.

Criminal Procedure Code. Section 482. When prosecution prima facie establishes receipt of huge money by son relatable to crime of corruption by the father defence of private transaction cannot be accepted to quash proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

Negotiable Instruments Act. Section 138. Non mentioning of transaction date in the complaint is not fatal to the case when evidence is led to corroborate the transaction details. Karnataka High Court.

Negotiable Instruments Act. Imprisonment ordered in default of fine in different and independent transactions. Sentence will run consecutively and NOT concurrently. Karnataka High Court.

Cr.P.C. Section 482. Though a transaction is civil in nature, if the complaint specifically avers dishonest and fraudulent acts inducing complainant to part with money, the criminal proceedings can NOT be quashed. Karnataka High Court.

Rape. Alleged bad character of a woman does not justify sexual assault on her. Karnataka High Court condemns the police machinery which tried to protect the rapist police officer.

Motor Vehicles Act. Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation under personal accident claim benefit even when the borrower of the vehicle met with personal accident. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act. After 1994 amendment, in case of goods vehicle, owner or his authorised representative are covered and entitled for compensation even though policy was issued earlier to 1994. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act. Vehicle covered under valid insurance policy driven by person without a driving licence at the time of accident. Insurance company has to pay compensation and recover the same from the owner. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicles Act. Comprehensive policy covers employee of owner of vehicle involved in accident. Insurance company is liable to pay compensation for death of such employee. Karnataka High Court.

Negotiable Instruments Act. Against the order of acquittal passed by the first appellate court, appeal to High Court under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C is maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

Forgery of document produced before the Court. If the document was already tampered before its production before the Court, bar under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) for prosecution will not apply. Karnataka High Court.

Complaint u/s 138 N.I. Act filed without application to condone delay. Limitation issue raised for the first time in appeal. Appellate Court can send matter back to trial court by permitting complainant to file necessary application. Karnataka High Court.

Review. An error, which is not self-evident and to be detected by the process of reasoning, can not be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record, justifying the Court to exercise the power of review. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for specific performance. When entire sale consideration is paid and possession of the property is also delivered to the agreement holder, the readiness and willingness issue becomes illusory. Karnataka High Court.

Defamation. Onus of proving two ingredients; truth of the imputation and the publication of the imputation for the public good, is on the accused. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

 Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Court cannot frame charge for ‘adulteration’ when prosecution case is ‘misbranding’. Judgement based on such charge liable to be set aside. Karnataka High Court.

Make sure that men of integrity are posted to Anti Corruption Bureau which is established to prevent corruption. Karnataka High Court directs the Chief Secretary to Government.

”Financial dependency is not the Ark of The Covenant”. Even the married sons and daughters are also entitled to compensation under the MVC Act. Karnataka High Court.

Workmen’s Compensation Act. There is no bar to enhance compensation invoking Order XLI Rule 33 of the CPC even in the absence of an appeal by the claimants. Karnataka High Court.

Death of driver due to heart attack while taking rest in parked vehicle shall also be construed as death during the course of employment. Karnataka High Court.

Motor Vehicle Act. Karnataka High Court exercises power under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC to enhance compensation from 11 lakhs to 44 lakhs in the appeal filed by the Insurance Company.

MVC Act. Insurance Company cannot escape its liability by merely branding driving license as fake without actually proving the same. Karnataka High Court.

After collecting premium for one year, Insurance Company cannot disown its liability on the ground that the registration of the vehicle expired in the meanwhile. Karnataka High Court.

Workmen Compensation Act. When the employer has not maintained the register, the salary claim of the claimant has to be accepted. Karnataka High Court.

After issuing the policy, Insurance Company cannot avoid liability if the cheque towards premium is dishonoured unless the Insurer cancels the policy and intimates the insured. Karnataka High Court.

Failure to conclude criminal trial expeditiously cannot be a ground to grant bail when the involvement in serious offences is made out. Karnataka High Court.

Rejection of earlier bail petition does not bar the Court from considering further developments on different considerations in a successive bail petition subject to gravity of the offence. Karnataka High Court.

Even the illegitimate children of the deceased are entitled to compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. Karnataka High Court.

Order rejecting bail petition does not preclude another petition on a later occasion giving more materials, further developments and different considerations. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

Order 41 Rule 33 CPC can be invoked to enhance compensation even in an appeal filed by the insured as well as Insurance Company in the absence of appeal filed by the claimant. Karnataka High Court.

Bail. Merely because another accused who was granted bail was armed with similar weapon is not sufficient to determine whether bail can be granted on the basis of parity. Karnataka High Court.

NDPS. Possession could mean physical possession with animus; exercise of dominion and control as a result of concealment; or personal knowledge as to the existence of the contraband and the intention based on such knowledge. Karnataka High Court.

Petition for anticipatory bail is NOT maintainable once accused appears through his Advocate and gets exemption from appearance. He can seek only regular bail. Karnataka High Court.

Hindu Succession Act. Grant of occupancy rights in favour of a woman member of the joint family under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act cannot be considered as her absolute property under Section 14. Karnataka High Court.

Permissive possession cannot be claimed as adverse possession unless the possession is adequate in continuity, adequate in publicity and adverse to a competitor. Karnataka High Court.

Limitation for suit for comprehensive relief of declaration and possession is 12 years under Article 65 and not 3 years under Article 58 of the Limitation Act. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for specific performance. When suit is filed after non-alienation period is over, the suit cannot be said to be barred by time especially when entire sale consideration is paid under the agreement of sale. Karnataka High Court.

Disposition property in unnatural, improbable or unfair manner and exclusion of or absence of adequate provisions for the natural heirs without any reason is a ground to doubt the execution of a Will. Karnataka High Court.

Though sale in violation of non-alienation clause is voidable, if no action is taken against the purchaser or the sale for long time, by virtue of Section 27 of the Limitation Act, the purchaser gets his title perfected. Karnataka High Court.

Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Limitation under Section 34(3) commences only from the date a signed copy of the award is delivered to the party applying for setting it aside. Mere knowledge of the award is not enough. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for partition filed several years after the property was sold by the karta or the mother is hit by the doctrine of acquiescence and the same is liable to be dismissed. Karnataka High Court.

Suit seeking direction to conduct prayers/mass prayers in Church in a particular language invoking fundamental right under Article 25 does not involve Canon Law. Plaint cannot be rejected on this ground. Karnataka High Court.

Suit or proceeding in relation to the guardianship of the person or the custody of, or access to, any minor, can be filed only before the Family Court and the District Court has no jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for partition filed three years after the minor coparcener attaining majority merely pleading that alienation of ancestral properties by karta is not binding on him is barred by law of limitation. Karnataka High Court.

Counter claim need not be within the pecuniary jurisdiction of a Court. When counter claim exceeds pecuniary jurisdiction, the Court shall return the plaint under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC to be presented before the proper Court. Karnataka High Court.

When the rent and the leased area are within the prescribed limit under the Rent Act, the Court must reject the plaint for ejection filed under the Transfer of Property Act. Karnataka High Court.

If the premises used for commercial purpose is more than fourteen square meters, it is excluded from the applicability of the Karnataka Rent Act. This can’t be defeated on the ground that its rent is less than the amount stipulated. Karnataka High Court.

Indian Succession Act. Jurisdiction of the court to grant Succession Certificate is based on the ordinary residence of the deceased at the time of death with an intention to stay at that place for a considerable length. Karnataka High Court.

Mere pendency of second appeal against dismissal of suit for specific performance of sale agreement between landlord and tenant is not a ground to postpone the eviction proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

Suit by purchaser of property during pendency of civil suit, seeking declaration that the decree passed in the suit is not binding on him, is not maintainable and the plaint is liable to be rejected. Karnataka High Court.

Plaintiff not signing every page of the plaint is not a ground to reject the plaint when the verification column is duly signed by the plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.

Cheque Bounce cases. Moratorium contained in Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code applies only to Corporate Debtors. Directors are liable under Chapter XVII of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Karnataka High Court.

Constructive resjudicata under Order 2, Rule 2 of CPC does not apply when the later suit is based on fresh cause of action. Karnataka High Court.

When specific averments are made in the plaint, the defence is immaterial while considering application under Order 7, Rule 11. Karnataka High Court.

Resjudicata is a mixed question of fact and law. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7, Rule 11(d) of C.P.C. without holding full fledged trial. Karnataka High Court.

Attachment under Order 38 Rule 5 of CPC. Even where the defendant is removing or disposing his assets, attachment before judgment will not be issued if the plaintiff is not able establish prima facie case. Karnataka High Court.

Appeal against grant/refusal to grant temporary injunction. Appellate Court can mould the relief taking note of the relief sought in the Trial Court as on the date of suit. Karnataka High Court.

Sale cannot be set aside under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC unless there is material irregularity which has resulted substantial injury to the judgment-debtor. Karnataka High Court.

Grant of temporary injunction in suit based on defamation. Issue regarding territorial jurisdiction goes to the root of the matter and the Court must consider this issue before considering other aspects. Karnataka High Court.

Judgment of the foreign Court is not executable in India if the same is not on merits. Even when the defendant is placed exparte, the judgment ought to be the one based on evidence led by the plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act is not a bar for the public authority to file for eviction against a dismissed employee seeking possession of the service quarters. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. Second revision petition under Section 115 of CPC is maintainable as against the revisional order passed by the District Court under Section 46. Karnataka High Court.

An independent suit questioning the compromise decree is not maintainable. Parties must approach the very same Court if any fraud or misrepresentation is alleged while obtaining the compromise decree. Karnataka High Court.

Second wife is not entitled to retirement benefits of her deceased husband. Karnataka High Court.

Section 5 of the Limitation Act can be invoked in an appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Karnataka High Court.

Bar of Civil Court jurisdiction in a statute. Before considering the application for temporary injunction, the court must first consider the issue regarding jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

Judgment on admissions. It is not permissible for the Court to make roving enquiry for disposal of the application filed under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC. Karnataka High Court.

Karnataka Rent Act. Date of filing eviction petition governs the jurisdiction of the Court. Subsequent conduct of the parties will not oust the jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

When appeal against dismissal of suit for injunction is pending, the same does not give right to the defendant to seek injunction by way of fresh suit on same the cause of action pleaded by him. Karnataka High Court.

Successive anticipatory bail applications ought not to be entertained when the case diary and the status report clearly indicates that the accused is absconding and not cooperating with the investigation. Karnataka High Court.

Preventing bank from exercising its right under the SARFAESI Act in the guise of partition suit among family members with prayer for injunction is hit by Sections 35 and 36. Karnataka High Court.

Second suit for partition, instead of enforcing the earlier decree for partition within the period of limitation, is not maintainable. Plaint is liable to be rejected. Karnataka High Court.

Revocation of probate under the Indian Succession Act. Delay in applying for revocation cannot be considered when the service of notice and publication of citation was defective. Karnataka High Court.

Hindu Succession Act. Mother as class-I heir is entitled to a share in her deceased son’s property. Her death during the suit/appeal will not alter the situation since Section 15 gets attracted. Karnataka High Court.

Counter claim for possession based on dispossession/trespass. Trial Court is bound to raise the issue of limitation even in the absence of any pleadings with regard to limitation. Karnataka High Court.

Sale deed registered outside the State in respect of property situated within the State of Karnataka is a void document and does not confer any right. Karnataka High Court.

When a registered sale agreement is admitted by the vendor, it is not necessary to examine the witnesses to prove the agreement. Karnataka High Court.

Plaintiff cannot file rejoinder, pursuant to the written statement, as a matter of right without obtaining leave of the Court. Karnataka High Court.

When one party seriously disputes biological relationship with another in a civil suit, the court shall allow the application for DNA test at the instance of the person claiming such a relation. Karnataka High Court.

Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. Only person with independent right has the right to record resistance and not a party who is tracing his right through judgment debtor. Karnataka High Court.

Public or ex-servicemen cannot claim right of way through Class A1 land exclusively belonging to military invoking Article 19 (1) (d) of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.

Land acquired and vested with the Government cannot be withdrawn from acquisition taking recourse to the General Clauses Act. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

A third party can institute separate suit challenging compromise award passed by the Lok-Adalat on the ground of fraud and undue influence. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for declaration cannot be decreed only on the basis of admission unless there is title deed showing the ownership. Karnataka High Court.

Indian Railways Act. Death or injury in the course of boarding or de-boarding train falls within the meaning of ‘’untoward incident’’. Victim is entitled to compensation. Karnataka High Court.

Specific Relief Act. A registered sale deed cannot be cancelled by another deed of cancellation even by the consent of the parties. The only mode is to re-transfer the property. Karnataka High Court.

Kartha/father can gift ancestral property in favour of his daughter within reasonable limits for pious purposes. Karnataka High Court.

Violation of Principles of Natural Justice itself is an independent ground for review of Judgment/order under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. Karnataka High Court.

Compact Disk containing telephonically recorded conversation with Certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act is admissible as secondary evidence. Karnataka High Court.

Incidental finding on title in earlier suit for injunction will not act as resjudicata in a later suit unless the relief for injunction was founded or based on the finding on title. Karnataka High Court.

 In a suit for injunction, valuation need not be split separately for Court fee and jurisdiction. It shall be valued only under Section 26(c) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act. Karnataka High Court.

Even in the absence of declaratory relief, Court can grant the relief of perpetual injunction with regard to the exercise of easementary right over the property. Karnataka High Court.

Order releasing the amount deposited under Section 148(3) N.I. Act does not amount to intermediate order since it is an interlocutory order. Revision before the High Court under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

Purchase of land and constructions put up subsequent to acquisition proceedings do not confer any right over the purchaser. Such person cannot maintain a suit for injunction against the acquiring body. Karnataka High Court.

When plaintiff’s suit for specific performance is barred by time, the defendant’s counter claim for possession can be granted by the Court. Karnataka High Court.

Purchaser of undivided share from a coparcener cannot insist on allotment of a particular developed portion in the partition when the construction was without the consent of the other coparceners. Karnataka High Court.

Hindu Women’s Rights Act. In the absence of an express prohibition in writing by the husband his widow had authority to make an adoption and such authority need not be proclaimed to anyone. Karnataka High Court.

Hindu Succession Act. Succession under Section 15 (2) is intended only to change the order of succession specified in sub-section (1) and not to completely eliminate other categories of heirs set out in sub-section (1). Karnataka High Court.

 Arbitration agreement entered into after the 1996 Act came into force but making a reference to Indian Arbitration Act or the 1940 Act shall be governed only under the provisions of the 1996 Act. Karnataka High Court.

Indian Succession Act. Apart from the executor named in the Will, even other persons can seek for a probate under Section 276 depending on the circumstances. Karnataka High Court.

Statements in autobiography. Unless a full-fledged trial establishes defamatory nature of the statements, which are allegedly based on true facts, injunction cannot be granted restraining circulation of the book. Karnataka High Court.

Where title to property is not disputed, suit for possession and consequential injunction is maintainable without seeking declaration of title. Karnataka High Court.

Though a comprehensive suit for declaration is pending, fresh suit for injunction in respect of the same property is maintainable when additional parties are added and fresh cause of action is pleaded. Karnataka High Court.

In order to invoke Section 420 of IPC, there must be dishonest intention from the very beginning which is sine qua non to hold that accused is guilty for commission of the said offence. Karnataka High Court.

While considering the application for temporary injunction, trial court cannot go into merits of the case or validity of a compromise decree between the parties. Karnataka High Court.

Criminal Law. Circumstantial evidence. Proved circumstances must be consistent only with hypothesis of guilt of accused and totally inconsistent with his innocence. Karnataka High Court.

“Know Your Judge”. Justice S G Pandit. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice S G Pandit celebrates his 59th birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shankar Ganapathi Pandit: Born on 16th November 1965. Appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and took oath on 14.02.2018 and Permanent Judge on 07.01.2020.

Important Judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S G Pandit.

Divorce. When the allegations of cruelty are consistent and specific which are not refuted by making available for cross-examination and in the absence of any contrary evidence on record, the court shall dissolve the marriage. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/CcE8QyK6U6NgWpzIomK5Unuqn

Property Tax. Assessing authority must furnish document or report on which it relies on to determine the tax liability to the assessee failing which assessment becomes illegal. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/J7SUC5FzGOJo30NpbosF1aFgC

Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. Order of attachment of property before award or order passed by the Registrar under Section 103 is appealable to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 105. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sZzSNqmS8Q0tyLAluoF04hls8

KIADB Act. Though no time limit is prescribed for publication of the final notification after the preliminary notification, if the final notification is not issued within two years, the acquisition will lapse. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/QLfAsxm2tdxwe2TkfE0Z5vYor

Motor Vehicles Act. Power of the Tribunal or the High Court to award just and fair compensation to the victim is not taken away because of prayer for a lesser amount. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/RdwNGdXfjDc2PcIiDJDuDt1CB

Education. ”On account of the pandemic, one cannot give up maintaining standards of education”. Karnataka High Court while rejecting plea of law students to dispense with exams. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/gZeUGT7o3ig8p2wuWUtS939ev

Caste Certificate and Creamy Layer Certificate cannot be treated alike. Caste Certificate status is permanent whereas Creamy Layer Certificate status varies from time to time depending on income. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/pvH8V0Px2wNa8X00sUAsryd1i

”Look Out Circular” cannot be sought by the bank for recovery of dues unless economic interest of the country is involved. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/SMbOkJKZgwqWiaHhC3hLqJxVd

When the statutory body fails to honor its commitment to allot industrial plot, it is bound to refund the entire amount paid by the prospective allottee. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/CdzBDekiB2GYJgGA8oASNymvq

Writ Petition challenging provisional seizure order under Section 37A of the Foreign Exchange Maintenance Act cannot be entertained since it is subject to confirmation of the Competent Authority. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/hyzfSzOLixeBnZncL34k08D1e

Karnataka Civil Services Rules. No enquiry can be initiated against a retired person in respect of an event which had taken place more than four years prior to the enquiry. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/QIGrB9fMMZyPvD7Z44QqSwryc

Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Initiation of proceedings 7 years after the sale that too after receiving the entire sale consideration is hit by doctrine of unreasonable delay. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/JE1YmGs0wo7RiVFlmAN3euYam

Hindu Marriage Act. Mere inability of the wife to obey decree for restitution of conjugal rights is not a ground to dismiss her petition for divorce. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/guHwrCwsRPd0Moq21Ydldsbnb

Obtaining approval or sanction from the Government is not mandatory while issuing Preliminary Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act for acquisition of lands in favour of the Karnataka Housing Board. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/QKFjIvT1x5DfTFO1kDFcut5Ed

When the State takes over private land of a person who has undisputed title over it, the owner cannot be asked to approach the civil court for compensation. Refusal to pay compensation violates constitutional mandate. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/bERYifzXGcQO8qX7vDVPlXsOW

Divorce. When the allegations of cruelty are consistent and specific which are not refuted by making available for cross-examination and in the absence of any contrary evidence on record, the court shall dissolve the marriage. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/CcE8QyK6U6NgWpzIomK5Unuqn

Property Tax. Assessing authority must furnish document or report on which it relies on to determine the tax liability to the assessee failing which assessment becomes illegal. Karnataka High Court. 

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/J7SUC5FzGOJo30NpbosF1aFgC

Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. Order of attachment of property before award or order passed by the Registrar under Section 103 is appealable to the Appellate Tribunal under Section 105. Karnataka High Court.

https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sZzSNqmS8Q0tyLAluoF04hls8

Suit for specific performance. Third parties or strangers to the contract cannot be made parties to the suit, even if they claim to be joint family members and assert title over the property. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/a0982300f7cf6665bb64bcee

When defendant raises a genuine dispute regarding title, thereby casting a cloud on the plaintiff’s title, the plaintiff cannot pursue a suit for mere injunction either preventive or mandatory. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/a897b8abc6583e37369e4882

Service Law. Corruption cases warrant severe penalties. Tribunal cannot replace dismissal order with compulsory retirement solely based on sympathy. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/2c1593a413e1217938a743d0

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Even statutory dues owed to Government get extinguished if such claims are not part of the insolvency resolution plan. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/cea77091cc00764e2c952eea

Legal representative of deceased defendant can file additional written statement setting up his own independent title to the plaint schedule property. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/d5yfMs8eqC2vycmIUtcMzJYMi

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act does not apply to transactions which have taken place prior to coming into force of the Act. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/pCY1sjKDuCBiYkSleOsYB9Bem

Commercial Courts Act. Loan or dispute with regard to loan not based on any mercantile document cannot be considered as ‘commercial dispute’ simply because the amount involved is above the specified value. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/M7yVLTf4rePg4sWG8iXNhHbAY

Expiry of arbitration mandate. For the purpose of calculating the period of twelve months, time during which arbitration proceedings were stayed by the Court has to be excluded. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/29i49SJKjVOkG6dn1YgMyhdsY

Expiry of the arbitration. When parties file claim, defence, counter-claim, rejoinder and surrejoinder, the last of the pleadings shall be taken as the starting point to calculate twelve months. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/arjSdobZkbkuuEln46hf2GErH

Review order by the Commissioner under Section 114A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act. The Standing Committee cannot interfere with the order since it has no appeal power. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/yCaP54CG6etE6rpsfDsuVrpAb

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act. Attachment of property in civil suit cannot be a ground not to sanction building plan for putting up construction on the property. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/aNxE8KkbnozQ0XMuHU5IaqFGn

Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Non-alienation clause operates from the date of final order passed by the Tribunal and not from the date of issuance of Form-10 to the tenant. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/xGYU6u87KgK7jcgsCepKKbfkX

Telegraphs Act. When a high-tension wire is erected over the land, definitely value of the land diminishes. While arriving at diminutive value, all factors such as crops grown, etc., is to be taken note of. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/vdmLcYS4zqnXwhRFS8sE4tBSz

Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act. Random scrutiny of the property tax returns can be undertaken by the Commissioner only after prior notice to the owner and inspection/measurement/survey of the property. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/V3qXhZmIzW12nepSJOTpez970

KIADB cannot unilaterally cancel allotment of industrial plot for non-implementation of the project in time when the delay is attributable to reasons beyond the control of the allottee. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/WSin1YBv0xI8auNOs4v4YQiqb

Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Initiation of proceedings 7 years after the sale that too after receiving the entire sale consideration is hit by doctrine of unreasonable delay. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/JE1YmGs0wo7RiVFlmAN3euYam

Karnataka Civil Services Rules. No enquiry can be initiated against a retired person in respect of an event which had taken place more than four years prior to the enquiry. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/QIGrB9fMMZyPvD7Z44QqSwryc

Compensation for drawing high-tension lines. Since possession of land remains with owners and growing agricultural crops permitted, diminutive value cannot exceed 30% of the market value. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/articles/actionView/xg9qdYNjnhAgb60murWWKc6b6

Registration Act. An unregistered document can be marked in evidence for collateral purpose. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/articles/actionView/PWtAmwzbU4V8BDyC0zLvnJgAx

MV Act. Ex-gratia payment paid to victim cannot be deducted from the compensation awarded to the claimants. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/articles/actionView/NOAFlcIsZOnjddMLavzfhMS7v