B.V. Acharya, Senior Advocate. Section 223 of the Bharathiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhitha 2023 ( for short “ Sanhitha” ) corresponds to Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973 ( for short “ Code” ). The said provision deals with the procedure to be followed when a private complaint is filed before a Magistrate. While …
Continue reading “New Criminal Laws. Provisions regarding private complaints unworkable.”
U. Ajay Kumar and others Vs The Union of India.Writ Petition 16681 of 2023 decided on 23 January 2024.Justice M. Nagaprasanna. Discussion and the declaration of Law: The petitioners, husband and wife are before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to consider their representation dated 20-06-2023 …
Continue reading “Inter-country Adoption. Authoritative Judgment of the Karnataka High Court.”
Sanjay M Peerapur and others Vs The Union of India and others. Writ Petition 62966 of 2011 decided on 5 January 2024. Justice Anant Ramanath Hegde. 2. Be that as it may, the Constitution of India which embodies egalitarian principles at its core recognises both men and women as equal. At the same time, the …
Adopting technology to its maximum use is one of the notable achievements of the Karnataka High Court. Covid scenario forced Judiciary all over India to create online platforms for videoconferencing that helped thousands of lawyers to effectively argue their cases sitting in different locations. https://wordpress.com/post/dakshalegal.blog/1205 During Covid scenario the Karnataka High Court dealt with batch …
Continue reading “Karnataka High Court to adopt advanced & safe technology for videoconferencing.”
Nitin Kumar Misra vs The Commissioner.WP 27604/2023 daily order dated 19 December 2023. Justice Suraj Govindaraj
Daksha Legal