Tag Archives: property-law

Alienation of the re-granted ‘Service Inam Land’ from the period 1:2:1963 to 7:8:1978 is valid and permission for sale is only a formality since the Deputy Commissioner is bound to give permission. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

Alienation of the re-granted ‘Service Inam Land’ from the period 1:2:1963 to 7:8:1978 is valid and permission for sale is only a formality since the Deputy Commissioner is bound to give permission. Karnataka High Court reiterates. To know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/BJgIIOisX5GEQJ1VIQOeB6Lrz

Criminal Trial. Wife cannot be dragged into criminal case simply because she is signatory to cheques along with her husband who is involved in illegal business transactions. Such practice should be curtailed. Karnataka High Court.

Criminal Trial. Wife cannot be dragged into criminal case simply because she is signatory to cheques along with her husband who is involved in illegal business transactions. Such practice should be curtailed. Karnataka High Court. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/6RXPosFYC3k8TILkFSu8aVqBC

Both “A” and “B” Kharab lands belong to owner of the land. Landowner is entitled for compensation in case of acquisition of kharab land. Karnataka High Court.

Both “A” and “B” Kharab lands belong to owner of the land. Landowner is entitled for compensation in case of acquisition of kharab land. Karnataka High Court. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/5sTvvHPgXeozkW9Fy5mwj843N

Land acquisition. Kharab lands falling under category ‘A’ of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules belong to landowners and not to Government. Landowners are entitled to compensation. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

Land acquisition. Kharab lands falling under category ‘A’ of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules belong to landowners and not to Government. Landowners are entitled to compensation. Karnataka High Court reiterates. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/cA82Orf6qOpoXE6tmoYtZiv8w

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act. Revenue Inspector is not competent to take possession of the excess land. Violation results in restoration of land to the owners. Karnataka High Court.

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act. Revenue Inspector is not competent to take possession of the excess land. Violation results in restoration of land to the owners. Karnataka High Court. To know more please click the below link: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionRead/xV58V722VKgFgPzAbZRVq7DKC

Important Judgments on ”Partition under the Hindu Law”.

1. Whether plaint can be amended at the instance of defendant in a partition suit to include property. Karnataka and Madras High Courts take different views.https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/natSxzJ7W8zO9pW6GdP85I0P32. Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Ancestral property partitioned and sold prior to 2005 amendment. Suit for partition by daughter is maintainable under the 1994 Karnataka amendment. Plaint cannot be rejected.https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/lbmbNrvwKN8j3BijpRs3AfViX3. …

Continue reading “Important Judgments on ”Partition under the Hindu Law”.”