Children of predeceased brother are also entitled to succeed to the property of the prepositus under the Mysore Hindu Law Women’s Rights Act, 1933. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Jqs83VRQOMRdEvv5p29UoMiO0
Tag Archives: property-law
Limitation Act. When plaintiff’s title is not in dispute and the plea of adverse possession fails, suit for possession based on title cannot be said to be barred by time under Section 65. Karnataka High Court.
Limitation Act. When plaintiff’s title is not in dispute and the plea of adverse possession fails, suit for possession based on title cannot be said to be barred by time under Section 65. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/TGwG0RcnU5x3lkVJdJlEqIl5g
Principle of ‘’Boundaries prevail over Measurements’’ would not apply when the measurement/extent given in the document is clear, definite, specific, unambiguous and certain. Karnataka High Court.
Principle of ‘’Boundaries prevail over Measurements’’ would not apply when the measurement/extent given in the document is clear, definite, specific, unambiguous and certain. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VEzLp33gdWVfi7uOlK55ob3qX
Contract Act. Section 65. Vendor cannot refuse to refund advance amount to the purchaser on the ground that the sale agreement itself was void or illegal. Karnataka High Court.
Contract Act. Section 65. Vendor cannot refuse to refund advance amount to the purchaser on the ground that the sale agreement itself was void or illegal. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/8SybbIzmSohMSPqSSgtSMfrXg
Suit for possession based on illegal dispossession shall be filed within six months from the date of dispossession. Subsequent amendment for possession in a pending suit for injunction will not cure the defect. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for possession based on illegal dispossession shall be filed within six months from the date of dispossession. Subsequent amendment for possession in a pending suit for injunction will not cure the defect. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZfUUcS30hrjBnifZx4Mlmwfz6
Suit for injunction without disclosing identity of the property as required under Order 7 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for injunction without disclosing identity of the property as required under Order 7 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sOhUDFINMAE6mQRCR1MT99ZoQ
Petition for Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of limitation. Karnataka High Court.
Petition for Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of limitation. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ITALzJNwgnLNch6fj8kRkXZe8
Municipal Corporation cannot insist on probate of a Hindu Will for change of khata since the Will executed by Hindus are not covered by Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act. Karnataka High Court.
Municipal Corporation cannot insist on probate of a Hindu Will for change of khata since the Will executed by Hindus are not covered by Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/EPLcsCfEmbyra4jUfwO3YnhJN
Suit for cancellation of decree obtained on the ground of fraud etc without seeking possession delivered pursuant to the decree is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for cancellation of decree obtained on the ground of fraud etc without seeking possession delivered pursuant to the decree is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/G4s6gOuH8WbHl1HM8kMaxGP1v
When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court.
When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court. To Know more click the link below: https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ag7nCvCM4Ofeku5opw6MObx3a
Daksha Legal 