Inayathulla N vs State by Police Sub Inspector and another Criminal Petition 13141 of 2023. Order dated 19 July 2024. Justice M Nagaprasanna. CRL.P NO. 13141/2023 Learned Additional State Public Prosecutor has moved the matter to recall the order dated 10.07.2024 on the score that the proceedings were quashed at the threshold, notwithstanding the fact …
Tag Archives: law
“Know Your Judge”. Justice Krishna S Dixit. Karnataka High Court.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishna S. Dixit celebrates his 60th birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishna S. Dixit was born on 20:7:1964. He enrolled as an advocate in July 1989. Since then he was practising in the High Court of Karnataka & High Court of Madras, specializing in Law of Writs, Election Laws & Service Laws. …
Continue reading ““Know Your Judge”. Justice Krishna S Dixit. Karnataka High Court.”
New Criminal Laws –Hurried Legislation.
N. Ravindranath Kamath, Senior Advocate, Bengaluru. (2) If the Court after taking cognizance of an offence, or commencement of trial, finds it necessary or advisable to postpone the commencement of, or adjourn, any inquiry or trial, it may, from time to time, for reasons to be recorded, postpone or adjourn the same on such terms …
Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023- A Critique
Shri. B V Acharya, Senior Advocate and former Advocate General for Karnataka Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (for short hereinafter referred to as“ Sanhita” ) replaces the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ( for short hereinafter referred to the as Code) . There can be no dispute that both Sanhita and Code deal with the …
Continue reading “Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023- A Critique”
Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/w0akRGWrJ8sCCfVJPfvjT1ok9
Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court.
Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/T4YYqjI8wBSXzkJFfyhgDeelJ
When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court.
When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ag7nCvCM4Ofeku5opw6MObx3a
Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZWejdKatiMper23zdPJdrQFOd
Sub-Registrar cannot be prosecuted for registration of a bogus document. Karnataka High Court.
Sub-Registrar cannot be prosecuted for registration of a bogus document. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/WtZgi4MO41mnL7wD9drtq9YKg
Once the plaintiff proves his possession and enjoyment of the suit property and when the defendant has chosen to contest the suit, the defendant’s interference could be inferred and the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction. Karnataka High Court.
Once the plaintiff proves his possession and enjoyment of the suit property and when the defendant has chosen to contest the suit, the defendant’s interference could be inferred and the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VYfhK7IXoR75PodnZMXWmKhSY
Daksha Legal 