“Know Your Judge”. Justice V Srishananda. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vedavyasachar Srishananda celebrates his 58th birthday today. Justice Srishananda was born on 29.03.1966. He was appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and taken oath on 04.05.2020 and Permanent Judge on 25.09.2021. His father Shri. Vedavyasachar is one of the leading lawyers in Karnataka known for his command over …

“Know Your Judge. Justice K S Hemalekha”. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Kannankuzhyil Sreedharan Hemalekha celebrates her 49th birthday today. She was born on 28th March 1975 at Belgaum to Late Sreedharan who was serving in Airforce and Late Chandramati who was homemaker. Passed S.S.L.C. from Divine Providence Convent School, Belgaum in the year 1990. Awarded with Student of Indian Classical Dance and practised …

“Know Your Judge”. Justice M. Nagaprasanna. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr Justice M. Nagaprasanna celebrates his 53rd birthday today. He was born on 23 March 1971. He is a very good cricket player and known for maintaining calm composure throughout the day. He delivered 50 Judgements in a single day apart from dealing with 482 criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C ! Justice …

Ancestral property fallen to the share of father in a family partition among his father and brothers cannot be claimed by his son since the property so allocated to his share becomes his exclusive property. Karnataka High Court.

Ancestral property fallen to the share of father in a family partition among his father and brothers cannot be claimed by his son since the property so allocated to his share becomes his exclusive property. Karnataka High Court. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/HbotLMcNTO8Wp0nICcnKwmELb

Alienation of the re-granted ‘Service Inam Land’ from the period 1:2:1963 to 7:8:1978 is valid and permission for sale is only a formality since the Deputy Commissioner is bound to give permission. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

Alienation of the re-granted ‘Service Inam Land’ from the period 1:2:1963 to 7:8:1978 is valid and permission for sale is only a formality since the Deputy Commissioner is bound to give permission. Karnataka High Court reiterates. To know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/BJgIIOisX5GEQJ1VIQOeB6Lrz

Criminal Trial. Wife cannot be dragged into criminal case simply because she is signatory to cheques along with her husband who is involved in illegal business transactions. Such practice should be curtailed. Karnataka High Court.

Criminal Trial. Wife cannot be dragged into criminal case simply because she is signatory to cheques along with her husband who is involved in illegal business transactions. Such practice should be curtailed. Karnataka High Court. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/6RXPosFYC3k8TILkFSu8aVqBC

Both “A” and “B” Kharab lands belong to owner of the land. Landowner is entitled for compensation in case of acquisition of kharab land. Karnataka High Court.

Both “A” and “B” Kharab lands belong to owner of the land. Landowner is entitled for compensation in case of acquisition of kharab land. Karnataka High Court. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/5sTvvHPgXeozkW9Fy5mwj843N

Land acquisition. Kharab lands falling under category ‘A’ of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules belong to landowners and not to Government. Landowners are entitled to compensation. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

Land acquisition. Kharab lands falling under category ‘A’ of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules belong to landowners and not to Government. Landowners are entitled to compensation. Karnataka High Court reiterates. To Know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/cA82Orf6qOpoXE6tmoYtZiv8w

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act. Revenue Inspector is not competent to take possession of the excess land. Violation results in restoration of land to the owners. Karnataka High Court.

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act. Revenue Inspector is not competent to take possession of the excess land. Violation results in restoration of land to the owners. Karnataka High Court. To know more please click the below link: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionRead/xV58V722VKgFgPzAbZRVq7DKC

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act. Even after exemption granted under the Act, Deputy Commissioner has the authority to proceed if owners of land violate the order of exemption passed by the State Government. Karnataka High Court.

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act. Even after exemption granted under the Act, Deputy Commissioner has the authority to proceed if owners of land violate the order of exemption passed by the State Government. Karnataka High Court. To know more please click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/TGkHsPIFgMMVcf6gR9MfAugcY