Land Acquisition. Compensation is payable even in respect of Pot/Phut Kharab with statutory benefits unless RTC shows it as canal, nala, road, tank, stream, burial/cremation ground, footpath or reserved for any public purpose. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/nz56CroeoVzkOlOxz3UwEn766
Tag Archives: karnataka-high-court
Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Suit for cancellation of sale deed in respect of agricultural land. Valuation is based on the land revenue and not on the amount shown in the sale deed. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Suit for cancellation of sale deed in respect of agricultural land. Valuation is based on the land revenue and not on the amount shown in the sale deed. Karnataka High Court. To Know more click the below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/oC6So9tioYUF992MIypeXhyLc
Transfer of property in violation of law against fragmentation is void and does not confer title. Suit based on such transfer is liable to be dismissed. Karnataka High Court.
Transfer of property in violation of law against fragmentation is void and does not confer title. Suit based on such transfer is liable to be dismissed. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/HVx1Kfxofn4jbbtZgNGL7ZUDc
Registered sale deed executed by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee cannot be unilaterally cancelled under the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (Regulation of Allotment of Property in Market yards) Rules 2004. Karnataka High Court.
Registered sale deed executed by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee cannot be unilaterally cancelled under the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (Regulation of Allotment of Property in Market yards) Rules 2004. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/iDmIGfEZFYZlT6l5RWuRrpbpv
Mere amendment to plaint adding properties describing them as joint family properties will not cause hardship since the nature of the properties need to be substantiated during the trial. Karnataka High Court.
Mere amendment to plaint adding properties describing them as joint family properties will not cause hardship since the nature of the properties need to be substantiated during the trial. Karnataka High Court. To Know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sVCMyPfROJTC8M6JYgp3tiYa0
Wife getting lumpsum maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C as full settlement is NOT precluded from claiming maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. Karnataka High Court.
Wife getting lumpsum maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C as full settlement is NOT precluded from claiming maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/EZS8eN2RcUcP6vrD6ahWShL4h
Karnataka Municipalities Act. Advance notice to Municipality is not required in a suit for permanent injunction if the very object of filing the suit is defeated by delay. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Municipalities Act. Advance notice to Municipality is not required in a suit for permanent injunction if the very object of filing the suit is defeated by delay. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/V1yHBSc6rkNy252BgghuGo6pk
Gift is between Donor and Donee. When donor who challenged gift deed withdraws the suit, his children cannot question the gift deed on the ground of fraud etc. Karnataka High Court.
Gift is between Donor and Donee. When donor who challenged gift deed withdraws the suit, his children cannot question the gift deed on the ground of fraud etc. Karnataka High Court. To Know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/2q91g3Nc709suMufdZKeoYM5x
“Know Your Judge”. Justice H.T. Narendra Prasad. Karnataka High Court.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.T. Narendra Prasad celebrates his 58th birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Harekoppa Thimmana Gowda Narendra Prasad: Born on 1st June 1966. Studied B.Sc., from D.V.S.College, Shivamoga in the year 1990 and LL.B., from Vidyavardhaka Law College, Mysuru in the year 1993. Enrolled as an Advocate in the High Court of Karnataka in …
Continue reading ““Know Your Judge”. Justice H.T. Narendra Prasad. Karnataka High Court.”
Municipal Corporation cannot demand arrears of property tax as a condition for transfer of khata since property tax can be demanded only after entry of name of the owner in the Tax Payment Register. Karnataka High Court.
Municipal Corporation cannot demand arrears of property tax as a condition for transfer of khata since property tax can be demanded only after entry of name of the owner in the Tax Payment Register. Karnataka High Court. To Know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/YeT2asPFbCTgIz1EaBZTuAsGh
Daksha Legal 