N. Ravindranath Kamath, Senior Advocate, Bengaluru. The independence of India was declared by the erstwhile British Government on 15.08.1947. Thereafter the new Constitution of India came into force on 26.01.1950. Thus India became a Republic. The Indian democracy is one of the largest democracies in the world. The very first Article 1 of the Part …
Tag Archives: india
Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023- A Critique
Shri. B V Acharya, Senior Advocate and former Advocate General for Karnataka Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (for short hereinafter referred to as“ Sanhita” ) replaces the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ( for short hereinafter referred to the as Code) . There can be no dispute that both Sanhita and Code deal with the …
Continue reading “Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023- A Critique”
Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/w0akRGWrJ8sCCfVJPfvjT1ok9
Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court.
Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/T4YYqjI8wBSXzkJFfyhgDeelJ
Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZWejdKatiMper23zdPJdrQFOd
Issue regarding valuation and Court fees cannot be tried as a preliminary issue in a suit and shall be tried along with other issues. Karnataka High Court.
Issue regarding valuation and Court fees cannot be tried as a preliminary issue in a suit and shall be tried along with other issues. Karnataka High Court. To Know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/CyRjk03cFcS7mUVjkJpGeCYhP
When property is transferred by way of a registered document, Revenue authorities are duty bound to make entry in the revenue records/mutation records without application of the parties. Karnataka High Court.
When property is transferred by way of a registered document, Revenue authorities are duty bound to make entry in the revenue records/mutation records without application of the parties. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/oXgYe9pSb9VpA6agXEWk7BCUj
If purchaser is already in possession of property prior to sale agreement, stamp duty payable in the case of delivery of possession under the agreement is not applicable. Supreme Court.
If purchaser is already in possession of property prior to sale agreement, stamp duty payable in the case of delivery of possession under the agreement is not applicable. Supreme Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/L45RBNOmppfRH95TkyZmOxzTO
Inclusion of property in a compromise petition contrary to provision of an existing law does not confer right or title on the parties. Supreme Court.
Inclusion of property in a compromise petition contrary to provision of an existing law does not confer right or title on the parties. Supreme Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/7rY4cMNnEg3C7hvH18HG3glw8
Wife getting lumpsum maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C as full settlement is NOT precluded from claiming maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. Karnataka High Court.
Wife getting lumpsum maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C as full settlement is NOT precluded from claiming maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/EZS8eN2RcUcP6vrD6ahWShL4h
