Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.P. Sandesh celebrates his 60h birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Hethur Puttaswamygowda Sandesh: Born on December 2nd 1964, at Hethur in Sakaleshpur Taluk, Hassan District to Late Sri. Puttaswamy Gowda and Late Smt. Kaveramma as a second son. He had his Primary Education at Hethur and Sakaleshpur. Secondary Education at Pre-University Government College, …
Continue reading ““Know Your Judge”. Justice H.P. Sandesh. Karnataka High Court.”
Hon’ble Mr. Justice S G Pandit celebrates his 59th birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shankar Ganapathi Pandit: Born on 16th November 1965. Appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and took oath on 14.02.2018 and Permanent Judge on 07.01.2020. Important Judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S G Pandit. Divorce. When the allegations …
Continue reading ““Know Your Judge”. Justice S G Pandit. Karnataka High Court.”
Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/T4YYqjI8wBSXzkJFfyhgDeelJ
Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZWejdKatiMper23zdPJdrQFOd
Once the plaintiff proves his possession and enjoyment of the suit property and when the defendant has chosen to contest the suit, the defendant’s interference could be inferred and the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VYfhK7IXoR75PodnZMXWmKhSY
Children of predeceased brother are also entitled to succeed to the property of the prepositus under the Mysore Hindu Law Women’s Rights Act, 1933. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Jqs83VRQOMRdEvv5p29UoMiO0
Limitation Act. When plaintiff’s title is not in dispute and the plea of adverse possession fails, suit for possession based on title cannot be said to be barred by time under Section 65. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/TGwG0RcnU5x3lkVJdJlEqIl5g
Principle of ‘’Boundaries prevail over Measurements’’ would not apply when the measurement/extent given in the document is clear, definite, specific, unambiguous and certain. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VEzLp33gdWVfi7uOlK55ob3qX
Suit for possession based on illegal dispossession shall be filed within six months from the date of dispossession. Subsequent amendment for possession in a pending suit for injunction will not cure the defect. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZfUUcS30hrjBnifZx4Mlmwfz6
Suit for cancellation of decree obtained on the ground of fraud etc without seeking possession delivered pursuant to the decree is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/G4s6gOuH8WbHl1HM8kMaxGP1v
Daksha Legal