“Know Your Judge”.Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar celebrates his 54th birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Shivashankar Amarannavar:  Born on 20.07.1970. Did B.Com., LL.M. (Karnataka University, Dharwad). Enrolled as an Advocate on 24th June, 1994. Started practicing in Dharwad District Court in the chambers of his father- Mr. B.M. Amarannavar. Worked as Special Public Prosecutor, Fast Track Court, Dharwad. Worked as …

“Know Your Judge”. Justice Krishna S Dixit. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishna S. Dixit celebrates his 60th birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishna S. Dixit was born on 20:7:1964. He enrolled as an advocate in July 1989. Since then he was practising in the High Court of Karnataka & High Court of Madras, specializing in Law of Writs, Election Laws & Service Laws. …

“Know Your Judge”. Justice K V Aravind. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice K V Aravind celebrates his 47th birthday today. Hon’ble Mr. Justice K V Aravind: Born on 12.07.1977. Native of Dodda Kurubarahally, Kolar Taluk and District. Graduated in law from University Law College, Bengaluru. Enrolled as an Advocate on 04.08.2000. Served as Jr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department from 2004 to 2012 and as …

New Criminal Laws –Hurried Legislation.

N. Ravindranath Kamath, Senior Advocate, Bengaluru. (2) If the Court after taking cognizance of an offence, or commencement of trial, finds it necessary or advisable to postpone the commencement of, or adjourn, any inquiry or trial, it may, from time to time, for reasons to be recorded, postpone or adjourn the same on such terms …

Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023- A Critique

Shri. B V Acharya, Senior Advocate and former Advocate General for Karnataka Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (for short hereinafter referred to as“ Sanhita” ) replaces the Code of  Criminal Procedure  1973 ( for short hereinafter referred to the as Code) . There can be no dispute that both Sanhita and Code deal with the …

Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court.

Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/w0akRGWrJ8sCCfVJPfvjT1ok9

Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court.

Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/T4YYqjI8wBSXzkJFfyhgDeelJ

When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court.

When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ag7nCvCM4Ofeku5opw6MObx3a

Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZWejdKatiMper23zdPJdrQFOd

Sub-Registrar cannot be prosecuted for registration of a bogus document. Karnataka High Court.

Sub-Registrar cannot be prosecuted for registration of a bogus document. Karnataka High Court. To know more click the link below: https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/WtZgi4MO41mnL7wD9drtq9YKg