Eswaraiah v. B.S. Siddalingappa. ILR 1999 Kar 3037 Full Judgment below. T.N. VALLINAYAGAM, J.:—Defendant No. 2 is the appellant who is aggrieved by the grant of injunction against him alone by the Courts below. 2. The facts are not in serious dispute. The plaintiffs who are the sons of one Siddamallaiah have filed a suit …
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Criminal trial. “Essence of conspiracy is a simultaneous conscious mind of persons participating in the criminal action to bring about a particular result by a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to it”. Case Law discussed. Karnataka High Court
Ningappa and others vs The State of Karnataka. Criminal Appeal 100059/2018 decided on 19 August 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/342132/1/CRLA100059-18-19-08-2020.pdf Relevant Paragraphs: 86. Whenever prosecution invokes Section 34 of IPC, it must be established that the criminal act was done by more than one person in furtherance of common intention of all. It must, therefore, be …
ನೊ೦ದಣಿ ಕಾಯ್ದೆ ೧೯೦೮. ಖಡ್ಡಾಯವಾಗಿ ನೊ೦ದಣಿಯಾಗಬೇಕಾದ ದಾಖಲೆಯನ್ನು, ನೊ೦ದಣಿಯಾಗದಿದ್ದರೂ ಕೂಡ, ಈ ದಾಖಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ಬೇರೆ ನೊ೦ದಣಿ ಆಗಬೇಕಾಗಿರದ ದಾಖಲೆ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ನಮೂದಿಸಿದ್ದರೆ, ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಹಾಜರು ಪಡಿಸಬಹುದು.
ಉದಾಹರಣೆ-. ಸ್ವತ್ತಿನ ಹಕ್ಕು ಬಿಡುಗಡೆ (ರಿಲೀಸ್) ದಾಖಲೆ ಖಡ್ಡಾಯವಾಗಿ ನೊ೦ದಣಿ ಆಗಬೇಕು. ಇದು ನೊ೦ದಣಿ ಆಗದಿದ್ದರೆ, ಇದನ್ನು ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸುವ೦ತಿಲ್ಲ. ಆದರೆ ಈ ದಾಖಲೆಯಲ್ಲಿ ನೊ೦ದಣಿ ಆಗಬೇಕಾಗಿರದ ಮರಣ ಶಾಸನದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಉಲ್ಲೇಖವಿದ್ದರೆ, ಈ ಒ೦ದು ಅ೦ಶವನ್ನು ಸಾಬೀತು ಪಡಿಸಲು, ನೊ೦ದಣಿ ಆಗದ ಹಕ್ಕು ಬಿಡುಗಡೆ (ರಿಲೀಸ್) ಅನ್ನು ಹಾಜರು ಪಡಿಸಿ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಬಹುದು. ಆದರೆ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯ ಈ ಒ೦ದು ಅ೦ಶಕ್ಕೆ ಮಾತ್ರ ದಾಖಲೆಯನ್ನು ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಬಹುದು. ಹಾಗೂ ಇದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯ ನಮೂದಿಸಬೇಕಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. Gangamma vs Rangaiah and …
Maintenance of a wife can be traced to the ancient Hindu scripture Smritis, Articles 15(3) and 39 of the Constitution of India. Healthy & educated woman is presumed to be capable of earning. However, this presumption does not extent to conclude that such earning would be sufficient to maintain herself. Karnataka High Court.
Ganesh Rao vs Sumana K and another. RPFC 22/2016 decided on 23 September 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/343536/1/RPFC22-16-23-09-2020.pdf Relevant portion: It is perhaps well to observe that the proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C is summary in nature. In a proceeding under Section 125 of Cr.P.C, it is not necessary for the Court to ascertain as …
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Tribunal has NO power to review its own order. Karnataka High Court.
Anjanappa and another vs United India Insurance Company Ltd and others. Writ Petition 6098/2014 decided on 8 October 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/346289/1/WP6098-14-08-10-2020.pdf Relevant Paragraphs: 7. Chapter XII of MV Act, 1988 deals with Claims Tribunals. Section 166 relates to Application for Compensation and Section 173 relates to Appeals. There is no provision of review. Even …
Specific Relief Act, 1963. Amendment of Section 20 with effect from 1:10:2018, though a ‘substitution’, is prospective in nature. Amendment does NOT apply to pending suits and appeals. Karnataka High Court.
M. Suresh vs Mahadevamma and others. Regular First Appeal 1560/2011 decided on 23 October 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/347178/1/RFA1560-11-23-10-2020.pdf Relevant Paragraphs: 20. The Specific Relief Act, 1963 (‘Act’ for short) has been amended by the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018 by Act No.18 of 2018, whereby Section 20 of the Act has been substituted inter alia …
Writ jurisdiction. “Public policy demands that parties shall not be permitted to bring fresh litigation on the same cause of action in the guise of new grounds which could’ve been urged in the earlier proceeding”. Karnataka High Court.
Arshad Ispat and Others vs Union of India and others. Writ Appeal 395/2020 decided on 10 July 2020. Author Justice M. Nagaprasanna. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/335508/1/WA395-20-10-07-2020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: 13. …..Jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 is always equitable and discretionary. In this appeal, we are testing an order made in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction …
Contempt of Court. Ex-parte Interim Order staying removal of an employee cannot be construed as a positive order for reinstatement. Contempt proceedings cannot be initiated for failure to reinstate the employee. Karnataka High Court. 3:11:2020
Shashidhara T.D. vs Dr. G. Vishwanatha. Contempt of Court Case 362/2020 decided on 3 November 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/347023/1/CCC362-20-03-11-2020.pdf Relevant Paragraphs: 3. As can be seen from the order dated 4th December 2019, it is an ex parte ad interim order by which, stay was granted to the order dated 17th September 2019. There is …
Service Law. War and Military service in the Armed Forces of India, as qualifying service, shall be reckoned to determine pension. (KPTCL Regulations). A pensioner cannot be denied relief on the ground of delay though entire arrears cannot be granted. Karnataka High Court.
R. Hanumatha Singh vs State of Karnataka and others. Writ Petition 54571/2018 decided on 23 October 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/347019/1/WP54571-18-23-10-2020.pdf Relevant Paragraphs: 9. I have given my anxious consideration to the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the material on record, and on analysis thereof the following questions arise …
University education. “Indefinite delay in holding ceremonial convocation shall not result in hardship to students”. Karnataka High Court directs award of provisional degree certificate on par with award of degree. 6:11:2020
Lanson Brijesh Colaco vs Rajeev Gandhi University of Health Sciences and others. Writ Petition 10935/2020 decided on 6 November 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/346985/1/WP10935-20-04-11-2020.pdf Relevant Paragraphs: 3(a) It is a matter of common knowledge that a Degree Certificate at hands is worth ten in the cupboard of the Campus, since gaining entry to portals of higher …
Daksha Legal 