Order in W.P.No.41189/2017 dated 19 March 2020Pursuant to the order dated 05.03.2020, objectionshave not been filed in the present petition.Shri Manjunath Prasad, the Principal Secretary,Revenue Department and Shri Vastradmutt, the LawSecretary are present.Law Secretary is hereby directed to take necessarysteps in issuing general circular to each and everydepartment, wherever representations of the persons arepending consideration. …
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Service Law. Seniority. Persons promoted in excess of backlog vacancies shall be continued against supernumerary posts in existing cadre till they get the date of eligibility for promotion in that cadre. Karnataka High Court.
M/s. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs B. Gurumurthy and others. Writ Appeal 448/2020 decided on 13 November 2020. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda. Judgment Link: https://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in/noticeBoard/wa448-2020.pdf Judgments referred to: Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India [1992 Supp (3) SCC 217], R.K.Sabharwal vs. State of Punjab (1995) 2 SCC 745, Union of …
ಅ0ತರ್ಜಾಲ ಮುಖಾ0ತರ ವಕೀಲರ ದಾಖಲಾತಿ. ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತಿನ ಮು0ಚೂಣಿ ಸಾದನೆ.
ಅ0ತರ್ಜಾಲ ಮುಖಾ0ತರ ವಕೀಲರ ದಾಖಲಾತಿ. ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತಿನ ಮು0ಚೂಣಿ ಸಾದನೆ. ಕೋವಿಡ್ ನಿ0ದ ಉ0ಟಾದ ಸಮಸ್ಯಯನ್ನು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತು ಅ0ತರ್ಜಾಲ ಮುಖಾ0ತರ ವಕೀಲರ ದಾಖಲಾತಿ ಮೂಲಕ ಯಶಸ್ವಿಯಾಗಿ ನಿಭಾಯಿಸಿದೆ. ಇದುವರೆಗೂ ಐದಕ್ಕೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ಅ0ತರ್ಜಾಲ ದಾಖಲಾತಿ ಪ್ರಕ್ರಿಯೆ ನಡೆದಿದ್ದು, ಆರುನೂರಕ್ಕೂ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ವಕೀಲರನ್ನು ದಾಖಲಾತಿ ಮಾಡಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಮೊದಲನೆಯ ದಾಖಲಾತಿ ಸಮಾರ0ಭವನ್ನು ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಉಚ್ಚನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯದ ಮುಖ್ಯ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿ ಅಭಯ್ ಶ್ರೀನಿವಾಸ್ ಓಕ ಉದ್ಘಾಟಿಸಿದ್ದರು. ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತು ದಾಖಲಾತಿ ಕಮಿಟಿಯ ಅಧ್ಯಕ್ಶರಾಗಿ …
Continue reading “ಅ0ತರ್ಜಾಲ ಮುಖಾ0ತರ ವಕೀಲರ ದಾಖಲಾತಿ. ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತಿನ ಮು0ಚೂಣಿ ಸಾದನೆ.”
“ಸಾದನೆಯ ಹಾದಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತು.” – ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿ ಡಾ. ಎನ್. ಕುಮಾರ್.
ಸಾದನೆಯ ಹಾದಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತು. ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿ ಡಾ. ಎನ್. ಕುಮಾರ್ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ ಲಾ ಅಕೆಡೆಮಿಯು ಏರ್ಪಡಿಸಿದ್ದ Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ಅ0ತರ್ಜಾಲ ಉಪನ್ಯಾಸ ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮದಲ್ಲಿ ತಾರೀಖು 3 ನವೆ0ಬರ್ – 13 ನವೆ0ಬರ್ ವರೆಗೆ ಉಪನ್ಯಾಸ ನೀಡಿದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ಉಚ್ಚ ನ್ಯಾಯಾಲಯದ ನಿವೃತ್ತ ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿ ಡಾ. ಎನ್. ಕುಮಾರ್, ಕಾರ್ಯಕ್ರಮದ ಮುಕ್ತ್ಯಾಯ ಸಮಾರ0ಭದ0ದು ಅಭಿನ0ದನೆ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಿ ಮಾತನಾಡಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತು ಕೈಗೊ0ಡಿರುವ ಕಾರ್ಯಗಳ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಪ್ರಶ0ಶೆ …
Continue reading ““ಸಾದನೆಯ ಹಾದಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ವಕೀಲರ ಪರಿಷತ್ತು.” – ನ್ಯಾಯಮೂರ್ತಿ ಡಾ. ಎನ್. ಕುಮಾರ್.”
Criminal Trial. “A conviction must rest on proof, so strong that Court must be convinced that what it concludes must necessarily has happened and is not reasonably explicable in any other way. When the prosecution has relied upon circumstantial evidence, it has to be proved as if there is no proof, than the offence having occurred other than the accused”. Karnataka High Court.
Prathap vs The State of Karnataka. Criminal Appeal 633/2014 decided on 7 October 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/347395/1/CRLA633-14-07-10-2020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: 29.. Any documentary evidence by way of an electronic record under the Evidence Act can be proved only in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 65-B in the teeth of Section 59 and 65-A. A …
Show cause notice with intention to blacklist should clearly spell out such intention: Supreme Court
Judgment Link: https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2019/18159/18159_2019_40_1501_24686_Judgement_16-Nov-2020.pdf https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/supreme-court-show-cause-notice-blacklist-intention CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3687 OF 2020 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 14228 of 2019) UMC TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANR. decided on 16 November 2010 Paragraph 14: Specifically, in the context of blacklisting of a person or an entity by the state or a state corporation, the …
No fault liability under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Rider of the vehicle, who is not the owner, can NOT claim compensation under the Section against owner of the vehicle. He can only claim to the extent of the contract i.e. personal accident cover. Karnataka High Court. 1:10:2020
The Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs Tushar and others. Miscellaneous First Appeal 22058/2011 decided on 1 October 2020. Judgement Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/348033/1/MFA21930-12-01-10-2020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: Facts. The rider borrowed motorcycle from its owner and while riding the motorcycle, he lost control and dashed against road side stone and died. The legal representatives of …
“Joint Hindu Family, Coparcenary, Joint Tenants, Tenants-in-Common”. Explained.
S. Basavaraj, Senior Advocate, Bengaluru. Coparcenary and Joint Hindu Family are NOT synonymous to each other. Joint Hindu family signifies a big institution which consists of a common ancestor, his mother, wife, male descendants, their wives, widows and unmarried daughters below to any degree. It is based on the sapinda relationship of the members. Joint …
Continue reading ““Joint Hindu Family, Coparcenary, Joint Tenants, Tenants-in-Common”. Explained.”
Whether plaint can be amended at the instance of defendant in a partition suit to include property. Karnataka and Madras High Courts take different views.
Karnataka High Court. Channaveerappa Gowda vs Renukappa Gowda and others. Writ Petition 34142/2012 decided on 1 April 2014. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgments/bitstream/123456789/942536/1/WP34142-12-01-04-2014.pdf Held: Paragraph 14. Coming to the case on hand, Order VI Rule 17 CPC provides that the Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings as …
Partition suit. New property cannot be added at preliminary decree stage. However, if sufficient cause is shown, a second suit for partition is maintainable regarding that property. Karnataka High Court.
Channaveerappa Gowda vs Renukappa Gowda and others. Writ Petition 34142/2012 decided on 1 April 2014. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgments/bitstream/123456789/942536/1/WP34142-12-01-04-2014.pdf Relevant paragraphs: 7. In a partition suit, first a preliminary decree is passed declaring the rights of the parties in the schedule property. During the course of final decree proceedings, the court has jurisdiction to alter shares …
Daksha Legal 