Suresh Shah vs Hipad Technology India Private Limited. Arbitration Petition (Civil)(S) 8/2020 decided on 18 December 2020. Chief Justice S. A. Bobde, Justice A. S. Bopanna and Justice V. Ramasubramanian. Judgment Link: https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2020/4768/4768_2020_31_1502_25082_Judgement_18-Dec-2020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: 15. A perusal of the provisions indicate the manner in which the determination of lease would occur, which also includes …
Author Archives: rajdakshalegal
Tender. Author of the tender document is the best person to understand and appreciate its requirements. Such interpretation should not be second-guessed by a court in judicial review proceedings. Supreme Court.
M/s. Galaxy Transport Agencies, Contractors, Traders, Transports and Suppliers vs M/s. New J.K. Roadways, Fleet Owners and Transport Contractors and others. Special Leave Petition (Civil) 127/2020 decided on 18 December 2020. Judgment Link: https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2020/22944/22944_2020_33_1501_25092_Judgement_18-Dec-2020.pdf Cases relied on: Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. v. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., 2016 (16) SCC 818, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. …
Registration Act,1908. Sub-Registrar is not bound to register sale deed pursuant to court decree unless the legal requirements are complied with. Karnataka High Court
Ashrafali vs Hari Rama Bireje by Lrs. Civil Revision Petition 100038/2018 decided on 15 December 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/353887/1/CRP100038-18-15-12-2020.pdf Facts: Suit for specific performance decreed. Original Judgment debtor refused to execute sale deed. Execution petition filed. The executing court appointed a Court commissioner to execute registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiff decree holder. …
The emergence of Robots and the Legal Issues arising therefrom
INTRODUCTION:Artificial intelligence is a huge step towards the future cartoons like Jetsons and Jimmy Neutron envisaged in us. The field of robotics is evolving rapidly with huge technological advances taking place every day. Artificial intelligence has entered whole new levels with the development of Sophia, the first humanoid robot by Hanson Robotics, a Hong-Kong based …
Continue reading “The emergence of Robots and the Legal Issues arising therefrom”
Indian Penal Code. Section 304A. There must be a direct nexus between death of a person and rash and negligent act of accused. Death due to electrocution. Criminal negligence against Section officer of the electric company not proved. Karnataka High Court.
Mahalingappa vs The State of Karnataka Criminal Revision Petition 2217/2011, decided on 4 December 2020. Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/353870/1/CRLRP2217-11-04-12-2020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: A careful understanding of requirement under section 304A are that there must be a direct nexus between death of a person and a rash and negligent act of accused. A remote …
Constitution of India. Articles 341 and 342. Entries in Presidential Order. Courts have no power to deal with question as to whether a particular caste or sub-caste or group of tribe is included in entries. Supreme Court.
The State of Maharashtra and another vs Keshao Vishwanath Sonone and another. Civil Appeal No. 4096 of 2020 decided on 18 December 2020. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice R. Subhash Reddy and Justice M.R. Shah. Judgment Link: https://main.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2020/15277/15277_2020_37_1501_25112_Judgement_18-Dec-2020.pdf Question: Whether the High Court in the writ petition giving rise to these appeals could have entertained the …
Purchase of property by father in the name of minor with reconveyance clause. Minor is bound by such clause. Supreme Court.
Nivarti Govind Ingale v. Revanagouda Bhimanagouda Patil, (1997) 1 SCC 475 Full Judgment: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Justice K. Ramaswamy and Justice G.B. Pattanaik Nivarti Govind Ingale v. Revanagouda Bhimanagouda Patil, 1. Delay condoned. 2. Substitution and impleadment allowed. 3. Leave granted. 4. We have heard learned counsel on both sides. 5. This …
Land acquisition. 2013 Act. Lapse under Section 24 is only when acquisition was under 1894 Act. Section does not apply to acquisitions under State enactments. Karnataka High Court.
L.Ramareddy vs The State of Karnataka and others. Writ Appeal 1415/2018 decided on 1 December 2020. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda. Judgment Link: https://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in/noticeBoard/wa-1415-2018-LA-BDA-01122020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: 18. The object and purpose of the LA Act, 1894, is for acquisition of the land for public purposes and for companies. The expression public purpose …
Karnataka Housing Board Act. Sanction of scheme by the State Government is mandatory before the Board takes up housing, land development or labour development schemes. Karnataka High Court.
The Karnataka Housing Board and another vs The State of Karnataka and others. Writ Appeal 5712/2012 decided on 1 December 2020. Justice B.V. Nagaratha and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda. Judgment Link: https://karnatakajudiciary.kar.nic.in/noticeBoard/wa-5712-2012-LA-KHB-01122020.pdf Relevant paragraphs: 20. Before proceeding to answer the points for consideration, the pertinent point that would arise for consideration in this appeal is, …
Service Law. Direct recruitment. Seniority list is based on merit rank and not the date of joining. Case law discussed. Karnataka High Court.
Dr. Sunilkumar Biradar vs The State of Karnataka and others. Writ Appeal 100040/2016 decided on 7 December 2020. Judgment Link: http://judgmenthck.kar.nic.in/judgmentsdsp/bitstream/123456789/353107/1/WA100040-16-07-12-2020.pdf Cases referred – W.A.No.245/2006 (S-PRO), disposed of on 31st July 2006, P. Srinivas Vs. M. Radhakrishna Murthy and others reported in (2004) 2 SCC 459, Suresh Chandra Jha vs. State of Bihar and others …
Daksha Legal 