“Know Your Judge”. Justice B M Shyam Prasad. Karnataka High Court.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B M Shyam Prasad celebrates his 54th birthday today.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bhotanhosur Mallikarjuna Shyam Prasad: Born on 8th January 1971. Appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka and took oath on 14.02.2018 and Permanent Judge on 07.01.2020.

Important Judgements delivered by Mr. Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad. 

Property inherited by a female from her parents reverts back to heirs of her father on she dying intestate and without issues. Suit for declaration by husband claiming such property ought to be rejected under Order 7 rule 11. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/NWLKO48RRXZ6i2vVzSBW34wIs

Once parties acknowledge existence of arbitration clause, Court can appoint arbitrator even if stamp duty is insufficiently paid. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/u2ntQqAc5HYTyzYrqEjahBZVD

When the prosecution fails to prove major offence, the minor and related offence falls into insignificance and the accused will be entitled to acquittal. Karnataka High Court. 

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/6kOPhZhSX9PhLmdSbdJoyg0VF

Arbitration and Conciliation Act. When arbitrator withdraws from the office, substitute arbitrator can be appointed only under Section 11 read with Section 15 and under Section 29A(4) thereof. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/kr56zwOoMI67AGDKvEURnTZPo

Appeal court should not allow amendment unless there is an error in the decree of the trial court and when the amendment relieves the party who lost the case from the consequences of a decision rendered on merits. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/C2RKlsSnuzv8PR0K2MiDB7jnv

Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Suit for cancellation of sale deed in respect of agricultural land. Valuation is based on the land revenue and not on the amount shown in the sale deed. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/XHwSeoIldKEHJ5yZMh1SbjsQr

Property inherited by a female from her parents reverts back to heirs of her father on she dying intestate and without issues. Suit for declaration by husband claiming such property ought to be rejected under Order 7 rule 11. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/NWLKO48RRXZ6i2vVzSBW34wIs

Once parties acknowledge existence of arbitration clause, Court can appoint arbitrator even if stamp duty is insufficiently paid. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/u2ntQqAc5HYTyzYrqEjahBZVD

When the prosecution fails to prove major offence, the minor and related offence falls into insignificance and the accused will be entitled to acquittal. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/6kOPhZhSX9PhLmdSbdJoyg0VF

 Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Questions of facts that impact title cannot be decided in proceedings under Chapter XI. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/PQZXALCma7nn1QdRZlH6HMjTR

 Bombay Pargana and Kulkarni Watan Abolition Act. Watan property belongs to the entire family, with all family members having hereditary interests eligible for a share. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/d801eebeebce168cfd5d15d9

Karnataka Stamp Act. Civil court cannot delegate its power to the District Registrar of Stamps to decide on the nature of the document and to determine the deficit duty. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/66fa35b9e9f839de43052b77

Petition for Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of limitation. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ITALzJNwgnLNch6fj8kRkXZe8

Wife with good educational qualification who quit salaried employment without any reason cannot demand maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Sg2NM9xS3d6MhzG0vztcItRkB

BBMP Act. Improvement expenses can be collected in instalments for transfer of khata. Non-payment of instalment cannot be a reason to deny benefit of revenue entry since the amount can be recovered in accordance with law. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/C8UCbF2KQuWY52iJwpRa2yjvY

Inter-State transmission of electricity under Section 11 of the Electricity Act 2003 can be regulated only by the Central Government. Karnataka High Court nullifies order of the State Government.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/zZfWEQ0cWCvVIsvMXnhaEiyIy

Pious obligation under the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act arises only if the plaintiff is able to demonstrate that the defendant has inherited some asset or estate from the deceased debtor. Karnataka High Court.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0dh92Sr6cpwIhzWXoNDOgZbP1

Published by rajdakshalegal

Senior Advocate, High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru

Leave a comment