Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ramachandra D. Huddar celebrates his 61st birthday today.
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ramachandra D Huddar. [13-08-1963]
Honble Mr. Justice Ramachandra Dattatray Huddar: Born on 13.08.1963. Native of Gokak, Belgaum District. Graduated in Law from R.L. Law College, Belagavi. Enrolled as Advocate and practiced at Gokak. Appointed as Munsiff on 08.02.1995. Appointed as District Judge on 02.07.2009. Served as Registrar (Review & Statistics), Registrar (Administration), Addl. Registrar General, Dharwad Bench, Registrar (Infrastructure & Maintenance) & Registrar (Computers). Served as Prl. District & Sessions Judge, Dharwad, Mysuru. Worked as Director, Karnataka Judicial Academy, Bengaluru. Served also as Prl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru and Sworn-in as Additional Judge of the High Court of Karnataka on 24.01.2023.
Important Judgments delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ramachandra D Huddar.
Money belonging to a citizen is his property. If that is retained by the State, that amounts to temporary acquisition of property for which compensation has to be paid going by Article 300A of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/7unzwn3DRZRnMGT8yhFZBtpcv
Banking Regulation Act. Bank can discontinue employment of a person who is convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude, whether he is sentenced or not. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/5l9ccvxsMuj0kf9sjmVcBIcES
‘’Judges cannot act like Mughals of bygone era’’. High Court cannot issue writ in derogation of law or transcend the barriers of law. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZDUU3SOJEDFDD6Mu1Vjs3bn81
Negotiable Instruments Act. When cheque is returned with the endorsement ‘’payment stopped by drawer’’, the penal provisions of the Act are attracted. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZGFXG0rHghbjQ46g01uSAb9X3
Land acquisition. Denotification and rescinding the denotification has to be gazetted so that the stakeholders challenge it; and the unscrupulous landowners would not prey the potential buyers on the basis of Denotification. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/VjGy8NBSNUjxzRn824jH7RVDP
UAP Act. Informal body of individuals ‘concerned’ with the terrorist act, though not actually involved in terrorist act, is also covered under the definition of ‘terrorist gang’. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/uGaf6mIY8LqirEHQlLzHbvugL
Mere usage of the words ‘Khayam’ or ‘Nirantara’ in a collateral document does not make lease of immovable property a ‘permanent lease’. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/OKg4Ik27s69iGtAuYBcZ9bu0U
Relief of declaration in a title suit to property benefits even those who are not impleaded as plaintiffs. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sFiRJp25kNW7FEvJyVLdRtiVb
When the appellate Court receives additional evidence such as expert opinion which requires to be analysed by the trial Court, the matter can be remanded to the trial Court. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/TFgbfu3VdzFs4eebEakV8PDFn
Not every application under Order 21 Rule 97 of CPC requires detailed enquiry. Courts must reject frivolous application at the threshold to enable the decree holder to reap the benefits of the decree. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/J9Tq8shxB0B5uNlvEvi2sDbZc
Hindu Succession Act. Failure on the part of daughters to claim share in house property in a family partition does not amount to abandonment of claim under the unamended Section 23. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/shiM2xZRtU9qKOzSvxZjs1vCT
Criminal Law. Circumstantial evidence. Proved circumstances must be consistent only with hypothesis of guilt of accused and totally inconsistent with his innocence. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sxJoNs2bVWIfBOqusAhxRrEY7
Industry showing payment of overtime wages as conveyance charges to evade the ESI contribution. Karnataka High Court imposes exemplary cost on the appellant industry.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/0I7Ub7xrWjtqw1kh5hnvFyfHJ
Though earlier suit for injunction does not operate as resjudicata, specific issues framed in the earlier suit and the decision rendered therein would certainly operate as resjudicata. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/BrfRXw0Mrpg9B3JVkA4gg1yjt
Plaintiff is bound by law of limitation when he files a fresh suit under Order 23 Rule (1) CPC. If liberty is granted at the appellate stage, the cause action for fresh suit must be different than the earlier one. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/ZQpRA6DWuJhQzjfMeBQW04rk6
Specific performance. Subsequent escalation in market value is not a ground to refuse specific performance of the agreement when all other factors are proved. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/MrJhfKVyNDG4CljLrTRFUpEF2
“Once the forest, always forest”. Karnataka High Court orders preservation and protection of Chamundibetta State Reserve Forest.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/articles/actionView/hr2MDgJ5vRsKKRvvNeIpwr0kR
Income earned by educational institutions through non-educational activities and sources is liable for Service Tax. Karnataka High Court.
https://www.dakshalegal.com/articles/actionView/jX09eINcCVcHyG9NkXvPrp4Q3
Daksha Legal 