Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Makkimane Ganeshaiah Uma celebrates her 60th Birthday today.
Born on 10th March 1964. Had early education at Government Primary School, Sringeri and Government Higher Primary School, Sringeri. Secured B.Com degree from J.C.B.M College, Sringeri. Obtained degree in Law from Vaikunta Baliga College of Law, Udupi and LL.M. from Kuvempu University, Shivamogga.
Enrolled as an Advocate in the Karnataka State Bar Council on 16th August 1988. Practiced and served in different branches like Civil and Criminal at Udupi, Gadag and at High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru etc.
Appointed as District Judge at Mysuru on 25th February 2008 and as Principal District and Sessions Judge on 23rd May 2011 and served at Bellary, Mangaluru and Ramanagara.
Served as Member Secretary of Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru on OOD during the year 2016.
Appointed as Additional Judge of High Court of Karnataka on 4th May 2020 and Permanent Judge on 25th September 2021.
Imposition of realistic, punitive cost is necessary to prevent abuse of process of court. Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 50,000 cost on husband who filed frivolous Habeas Corpus petition seeking custody of child from wife.
Complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not maintainable only against Director of Company unless the Company is also made party to the proceedings. Karnataka High Court reiterates.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Dishonour of cheque issued by outgoing/retired partner does NOT bind the partnership firm or other partners. Karnataka High Court.
Civil Court has no jurisdiction to grant temporary injunction restraining change of mutation entries under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Karnataka High Court.
Accused, after obtaining bail absconds and proclaimed by Court as ‘absconding accused’. He is not entitled for anticipatory bail. Karnataka High Court.
Renouncants married under French Civil Code can not apply for divorce under Indian Christian Marriage Act 1872 or the Special Marriage Act 1954. Only the French Civil Code governs them. Karnataka High Court.
POSCO Act. Statement recorded under Section 164 of Criminal Procedure Code can NOT be considered to be evidence under Section 35 of the POCSO Act. Karnataka High Court.
POSCO Act. Failure to record evidence of the child within thirty days of cognizance and to complete the trial within one year, will NOT entitle accused for default bail. Karnataka High Court.
POCSO. Apart from rendering justice to child victims, concomitant support service systems have also to be provided, as the child victim faces physical injury and psychological trauma. Karnataka High Court issues directions for system overhaul.
Disposal of immovable property by Will would not amount to transfer within the meaning of Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act and hence the prohibition under Section 61 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act also does not apply. Karnataka High Court.
Bequeathing granted land by Will to non-SC/ST person by original grantee does not attract the provisions of the Karnataka SC/ ST (PTCL) Act, 1978 since Will does not amount to transfer of property. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for injunction. Where issue is framed regarding title of the plaintiff to the property, court fee is payable on the market value under Section 26(c)(ii) of the Karnataka Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act. Karnataka High Court.
Proceedings under Order 39 Rule 2A of CPC for violation of court order is maintainable even against third parties who are bound by the order. Karnataka High Court.
”It’s time to restore confidence of the people in independent judiciary”. Karnataka High Court charges Tahshildar for contempt of Court for not entering name of the farmer in revenue records despite court orders.
Property inherited by woman from her father will revert to her father’s heirs if she dies issueless. Hence the woman’s husband is not a necessary party in the suit for partition of the said property. Karnataka High Court.
Daksha Legal 